(Slightly OT) Multiple integrals in LaTeX

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on formatting triple integrals in LaTeX, specifically how to present limits clearly. Users suggest using the \limits command for better visual representation, but some find it unsatisfactory. A recommended approach is to define a region R for the integral, simplifying the notation. Additionally, multiline limits using \substack are proposed for improved clarity in complex conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with LaTeX typesetting
  • Understanding of triple integrals and their notation
  • Knowledge of mathematical set notation
  • Experience with LaTeX commands such as \iiint and \limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced LaTeX formatting techniques for mathematical expressions
  • Learn about defining regions in integrals using set notation
  • Investigate the use of \substack for multiline limits in LaTeX
  • Study improper integrals and their representation in LaTeX
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students, and educators who require precise formatting of integrals in LaTeX for academic papers or presentations.

Muzza
Messages
689
Reaction score
1
How do you make the limits in a triple integral look okay? I need to write something like:

\iiint_{x \geq 3, y \geq 4, z \geq 5, 2z - x \geq 5} f(x, y, z)\, dx\,dy\,dz

but it looks kind of silly right now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you use \ limits_{down}^{up} you can get the text 'down' and 'up' above and below the integral signs. Also works for summation symbols.

\iiint \limits_{x \geq 3, y \geq 4, z \geq 5, 2z - x \geq 5} f(x, y, z)\, dx\,dy\,dz

But it still looks crappy. :frown:

I'd advice just writing
\iiint \limits_{R} f(x, y, z)\, dx\,dy\,dz
where
R=\{(x,y,z)|x \geq 3, y \geq 4, z \geq 5, 2z - x \geq 5\}
 
Last edited:
You're right. I'm probably better off just defining some set S = {(x, y, z); x >= 3, blah} and taking the integral over S.
 
I'm wondering what in the world you mean! You want to take an integral over x\ge 3 but no upper limit on x? That just doesn't make sense.

If you want something like
\int_{x=3}^{5}\int_{y= 4}^{5- x}\int_{z=5}^{x+ y}f(x,y,z)dzdydx
click on the LaTex to see how it is done.
 
It's an improper integral. But this is all beside the point, I don't actually want to compute this particular integral. It was just an example I pulled out of thin air to illustrate my point.
 
Last edited:
You should be able to stack the conditions in the limit:

\iiint \limits_{\substack{x \geq 3,\\ y \geq 4,\\ z \geq 5,\\ 2z - x \geq 5}} f(x, y, z)\, dx\,dy\,dz

ok, not very nice as-is, but multiline limits should give more flexibility.
 
Why not just give each integral sign -- say, the one for the variable x -- a lower limit of 3 and an upper limit of infinity?

- Warren
 
Again, the limits in my original post were just examples. There are situations where it's difficult or even impossible to write down the iterated integral, hence the need for descriptions like those in my first post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
921