Slope of a mountain ridge (Gradient)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lambda96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slope
Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Write ##h(r)=H## as ##y(H,x)##

and

Calculate steepest and flattest slope with ##|| \nabla h(r) ||##
Relevant Equations
none
Hi

I am not quite sure if I have calculated the whole task correctly, since I am not sure whether I have solved task e correctly and unfortunately have problems with task f

Bildschirmfoto 2023-12-12 um 15.44.42.png

The function h(r) looks like this ##h(r)=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}}+1##

I got the following for the gradient

##\nabla h(r)=\left(\begin{array}{c} -\frac{x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}} \\ - \frac{xy}{(x^2+y^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \end{array}\right)##

and the plot for contour lines looks like this:

Bildschirmfoto 2023-12-12 um 12.13.22.png


##\textbf{Task e}##

I then solved the equation ##h(r)=H## for y as follows ##y(H,x)= \sqrt{\frac{x^2}{(H-1)^2}-x^2}## The shape of the contour lines in the first square are all straight lines

I could only see that they are straight lines from the contour lines plot and not from the equation above, did I calculate y(H,x) incorrectly?

##\textbf{Task f}##

The amount of the gradient should be calculated as follows

##|| \nabla h(r) ||=\sqrt{\biggl( -\frac{x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+y^2}} \biggr)^2 + \biggl( -\frac{xy}{(x^2+y^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}} \biggr)^2}##

and then got the following

##|| \nabla h(r) ||= \sqrt{\frac{y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^2}}##

For the steepest and flattest slope, I have to insert the points into the above equation where the gradient is zero, so ##\nabla h(r)= \left(\begin{array}{c} 0 \\ 0 \\ \end{array}\right)## I have calculated these points with mathematica and if I have not made a mistake, unfortunately only complex solutions come out

Bildschirmfoto 2023-12-12 um 16.25.08.png

Have I made a mistake in calculating the steepest or flattest ascent or can I only do this with ##|| \nabla h(r) ||##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In polar coordinates x = r \cos \theta, y = r \sin \theta for -\pi \leq \theta < \pi we have h(r, \theta) = 1 + \cos \theta. It follows that \nabla h = -\frac{\sin \theta}{r}\mathbf{e}_\theta = - \frac{y}{r^2}(-y/r, x/r)^T and \|\nabla h\| = \frac{|\sin \theta|}{r} = \frac{|y|}{x^2 + y^2}. This is zero whenever y = 0 (and is undefined at the origin).

I suspect the fact that \nabla h has degenerate (ie, non-isolated) zeros is confusing whatever algorithm Mathematica is using to solve \nabla h = 0. Think before you compute!
 
Thank you pasmith for your help 👍

Where the gradient is zero, there is either a maximum and minimum, the magnitude of the gradient is then also zero.

As you have already written, this would be the case for ##y=0##. If I now insert ##y=0## into the equation ##h(r)##, I get ##h(x,0)=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2}}+1## and is either zero for ##x<0## or 2 for ##x>0##

So the steepest slope would be 2 and the flattest 0
 
Lambda96 said:
Thank you pasmith for your help 👍

Where the gradient is zero, there is either a maximum and minimum, the magnitude of the gradient is then also zero.

As you have already written, this would be the case for ##y=0##. If I now insert ##y=0## into the equation ##h(r)##, I get ##h(x,0)=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2}}+1## and is either zero for ##x<0## or 2 for ##x>0##

So the steepest slope would be 2 and the flattest 0

"Steepest slope" is where the magnitude of the gradient is maximal, and "flattest slope" is where the magnitude of the gradient is minimal. You can see from my earlier post that \|\nabla h\| increases without limit as r \to 0 for y \neq 0 and is zero when y = 0.
 
pasmith said:
This is zero whenever y=0 (and is undefined at the origin).
Do you mean "(except that it is undefined at the origin)"?
 
Thank you pasmith for your help 👍
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top