Slow Forums: PF Under DDOS Attack

[turbo]

We used the trick of drawing sloping pencil lines on the side of the card deck to make it easy to spot cards out of sequence and even to help put them back in sequence after dropping them.

That's the only reliable way of protecting your hours and hours of coding and punching. It was important to get it right the first time, because the university's computer was VERY busy night and day, and homework assignments did not get priority. Re-do's could be hectic, especially if the instructors put you on short deadlines.

 

[dlgoff]

We used the trick of drawing sloping pencil lines on the side of the card deck to make it easy to spot cards out of sequence and even to help put them back in sequence after dropping them.

Back in those early days, I had an EE course where the instructor passed out of box of IBM punch cards (100s of cards/box) to each student. Each box contained a working program, without deck markings, that had been purposely randomized. The whole class was based on getting them back in order so the program would run without errors.

 

[AlephZero]

Back in those early days, I had an EE course where the instructor passed out of box of IBM punch cards (100s of cards/box) to each student. Each box contained a working program, without deck markings, that had been purposely randomized. The whole class was based on getting them back in order so the program would run without errors.

Did you get extra credit for making them into a program that did something more interesting than the instructor's?

We all used the "diagonal lines in felt tip pen" trick, but we also took the boring step of getting the computer to punch a new deck of cards with sequence numbers on them. That took all the fun out of accidentally knocking a tray of 2000 cards off somebody's desk onto the floor.

"Real programmers don't need abstract concepts to get their jobs done: they are perfectly happy with a keypunch, a FORTRAN IV compiler, and a beer."
http://www.ee.ryerson.ca/~elf/hack/realmen.html

 

[jhae2.718]

"Real programmers don't need abstract concepts to get their jobs done: they are perfectly happy with a keypunch, a FORTRAN IV compiler, and a beer."
http://www.ee.ryerson.ca/~elf/hack/realmen.html

http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/mel.html

 

[DaveC426913]

We used the trick of drawing sloping pencil lines on the side of the card deck to make it easy to spot cards out of sequence and even to help put them back in sequence after dropping them.

Ah, that takes me back.

So does slipping a 3 card loop randomly into the class stack:

while (true) do
   print "Jim is a dork!"
enddo

Good times. Good times.

 

[jtbell]

We used the trick of drawing sloping pencil lines on the side of the card deck to make it easy to spot cards out of sequence and even to help put them back in sequence after dropping them.

Didn't anyone put sequence numbers in the last eight columns of the cards? That's why Fortran compilers only used columns 1-72, after all. The computer lab where I learned to program had a card-sorting machine which you could use to re-sort a deck that had gotten out of order, provided of course that the cards had those sequence numbers on them.

 

[nismaratwork]

Didn't anyone put sequence numbers in the last eight columns of the cards? That's why Fortran compilers only used columns 1-72, after all. The computer lab where I learned to program had a card-sorting machine which you could use to re-sort a deck that had gotten out of order, provided of course that the cards had those sequence numbers on them.

Ooooooh... someone had it good.

 

[jtbell]

Good times. Good times.

Snoopy calendars and Playboy Playmates in ASCII art on the line printers. Those were the days. :!)

 

[nismaratwork]

Snoopy calendars and Playboy Playmates in ASCII art on the line printers. Those were the days. :!)

………………..,-~*’`¯lllllll`*~,
…………..,-~*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll¯`*-,
………,-~*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll*-,
……,-*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.\
….;*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll,-~*~-,llllllllllllllllllll\
…..\lllllllllllllllllllllllllll/………\;;;;llllllllllll,-`~-,
…...\lllllllllllllllllllll,-*………..`~-~-,…(.(¯`*,`,
…….\llllllllllll,-~*…………………)_-\..*`*;..)
……..\,-*`¯,*`)…………,-~*`~.………….../
……...|/.../…/~,…...-~*,-~*`;……………./.\
……../.../…/…/..,-,..*~,.`*~*…………….*...\
…….|.../…/…/.*`...\...……………………)….)¯`~,
…….|./…/…./…….)……,.)`*~-,……….../….|..)…`~-,
……/./.../…,*`-,…..`-,…*`….,---…...\…./…../..|……...¯```*~-
…...(……….)`*~-,….`*`.,-~*.,-*……|…/.…/…/…………\
…….*-,…….`*-,...`~,..``.,,,-*……….|.,*...,*…|…...\
……….*,………`-,…)-,…………..,-*`...,-*….(`-,…



God I miss ASCII art...

 

[turbo]

Snoopy calendars and Playboy Playmates in ASCII art on the line printers. Those were the days. :!)

The Comp-Sci jerks gave us Engineering types all kinds of crap about how much access we could have to "their" mainframe, but they all seemed to have tons of ASCII "art" and other frivolous stuff in their dorm rooms. When I could buy my own computer (decades later) I jumped at it!

 

[Lancelot59]

………………..,-~*’`¯lllllll`*~,
…………..,-~*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll¯`*-,
………,-~*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll*-,
……,-*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.\
….;*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll,-~*~-,llllllllllllllllllll\
…..\lllllllllllllllllllllllllll/………\;;;;llllllllllll,-`~-,
…...\lllllllllllllllllllll,-*………..`~-~-,…(.(¯`*,`,
…….\llllllllllll,-~*…………………)_-\..*`*;..)
……..\,-*`¯,*`)…………,-~*`~.………….../
……...|/.../…/~,…...-~*,-~*`;……………./.\
……../.../…/…/..,-,..*~,.`*~*…………….*...\
…….|.../…/…/.*`...\...……………………)….)¯`~,
…….|./…/…./…….)……,.)`*~-,……….../….|..)…`~-,
……/./.../…,*`-,…..`-,…*`….,---…...\…./…../..|……...¯```*~-
…...(……….)`*~-,….`*`.,-~*.,-*……|…/.…/…/…………\
…….*-,…….`*-,...`~,..``.,,,-*……….|.,*...,*…|…...\
……….*,………`-,…)-,…………..,-*`...,-*….(`-,…



God i miss ascii art...

I have a pretty good ASCII Half-Life 2 lambda.

[B]                 ?MMMI                  
            MMMMMMMNNNNNNNN             
         OMMMMNNN.  . ONNNNNNN          
        MMMMN.            .DDDD+        
      NMMNN                  DDD8       
     NMNN      DDDDDD         D888      
    MNNN         8888.         ,OOO     
   .NNN           8OOO          OZOO    
   NNNO           OOZZ.          $ZZ    
   NNN           ZZZ$$$          777    
  .NDD          Z$$$7777         :II=   
   DDD         $$77 III?         ,??~   
   DD8        $77I.  ??++        =++    
   D888      77II.    ===.       ~~~    
   =88O     7II?      ~~~~~::   ::::    
    8OOZ   7I??.       ::::,.. ,,,,     
     OZ$$                     ,,,,      
      $$7I?                  ...       
       :I?++=             ...        
         +==~~::,,    ...          
            ::,,...            
                ...            [/B]

 

[nismaratwork]

Lancelot, that's fantstic!

 

[DaveC426913]

Snoopy calendars and Playboy Playmates in ASCII art on the line printers. Those were the days. :!)

………………..,-~*’`¯lllllll`*~,
…………..,-~*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll¯`*-,
………,-~*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll*-,
……,-*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.\
….;*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll,-~*~-,llllllllllllllllllll\
…..\lllllllllllllllllllllllllll/………\;;;;llllllllllll,-`~-,
…...\lllllllllllllllllllll,-*………..`~-~-,…(.(¯`*,`,
…….\llllllllllll,-~*…………………)_-\..*`*;..)
……..\,-*`¯,*`)…………,-~*`~.………….../
……...|/.../…/~,…...-~*,-~*`;……………./.\
……../.../…/…/..,-,..*~,.`*~*…………….*...\
…….|.../…/…/.*`...\...……………………)….)¯`~,
…….|./…/…./…….)……,.)`*~-,……….../….|..)…`~-,
……/./.../…,*`-,…..`-,…*`….,---…...\…./…../..|……...¯```*~-
…...(……….)`*~-,….`*`.,-~*.,-*……|…/.…/…/…………\
…….*-,…….`*-,...`~,..``.,,,-*……….|.,*...,*…|…...\
……….*,………`-,…)-,…………..,-*`...,-*….(`-,…



God I miss ASCII art...

Uummmm...

In my day, Playboy Playmates were much prettier than that. Much less ... Cthulhu-esque.

Heck, Snoopy was prettier than that...

 

[nismaratwork]

Uummmm...

In my day, Playboy Playmates were much prettier than that. Much less ... Cthulhu-esque.

Heck, Snoopy was prettier than that...

Hey, you don't have to tell me G-rated twice!

Still, an ASCII facepalm is generally more useful than low-res breasts.

Snoopy, I just don't have in my collection... good pup though.

 

[dlgoff]

Didn't anyone put sequence numbers in the last eight columns of the cards? That's why Fortran compilers only used columns 1-72, after all.

When you (student) have been up all night punching cards and waiting for your output to debug, those last columns don't seem too important.

 

[DaveC426913]

... an ASCII facepalm ...

omg, the moment you said that I looked back and now it jumped out at me.

I swear, all I could see in it was a nasty squid-skull thing crawling across the screen on stumpy little tentacles.

 

[Lancelot59]

omg, the moment you said that i looked back and now it jumped out at me.

I swear, all i could see in it was a nasty squid-skull thing crawling across the screen on stumpy little tentacles.

Here's Captain Picard:
.........______ __......
.......,.-‘”......``~.,.....
.......,.-”.......“-.,...
.....,/.........”:, ...
.....,?...... ......\,...
....../......... ...,}...
..../......... ...,:`^`..}...
.../......... .,:”.../...
.....?...__...... ....:`.../...
..../__.(...“~-,_........,:`.../...
.../(_...”~,_...“~,_......,:`... ..._/...
...{.._$;_...”=,_...“-,_...,.-~-,},.~”;/...}...
...((...*~_...”=-._...“;,,./`.../”...../...
...,,,___.\`~,...“~.,......`... }...../....
...(...`=-,,...`......(...;_,,-”...
.../.`~,...`-......\.../\......
....\`~.*-,........|,./...\,__...
,,_...}.>-._\.......|... ...`=~-,...
...`=~-,_\_...`\,.......\... .....
......`=~-,,.\,......\.... ...
......`:,,..... ....`\.....__..
........`=-,......,%`>--==``...
......._\... ..._,-%...`\...
.......,<`.._|_,-&``...`\.....

 

[DaveC426913]

Captain Picard seems to be having a skull malfunction...

 

[Lancelot59]

Captain Picard seems to be having a skull malfunction...

Nobody said ASCII was perfect.

 

[DaveC426913]

Nobody said ASCII was perfect.

Actually, I'm pretty sure it's a proportional font thing.
I've been trying to take the image, drop it in CODE tags, and remove the dots to see if that fixes it, but no joy yet.

 

[Lancelot59]

Actually, I'm pretty sure it's a proportional font thing.
I've been trying to take the image, drop it in CODE tags, and remove the dots to see if that fixes it, but no joy yet.

Are you using a replace function to replace all the periods with spaces?

 

[nismaratwork]

omg, the moment you said that I looked back and now it jumped out at me.

I swear, all I could see in it was a nasty squid-skull thing crawling across the screen on stumpy little tentacles.

You referenced Lovecraft, all is well.

 

[DaveC426913]

Are you using a replace function to replace all the periods with spaces?

That was the idea, yes.

 

[AlephZero]

When you (student) have been up all night punching cards and waiting for your output to debug, those last columns don't seem too important.

Try editing input data on paper tape, and then watch a high speed tape reader "stress-test" your splices.

Punched cards were for wimps.

 

[AlephZero]

Snoopy calendars and Playboy Playmates in ASCII art on the line printers. Those were the days. :!)

And writing programs to make the line printer play the William Tell overture. (Or the "Dick Barton Special Agent" signature tune, in the UK).

Dada dum dada dum dada dum dum dum [repeat 3 times] dada DRRRRRRRRdadada dum dum dum...

 

[dlgoff]

Try editing input data on paper tape, and then watch a high speed tape reader "stress-test" your splices.

Punched cards were for wimps.

Never spliced paper punch tape before. Dang, I must be a wimp.

 

[fluidistic]

Some pages won't open, others will do within 5 minutes for me. Strangely I can reach PF much faster than days ago.

 

[Borek]

Several minutes ago I got 502 Bad Gateway error - I believe that's the same one I have seen when DOS attack started. Luckily seems like it was temporary, it stopped right after I contacted Greg to tell him something is wrong, but I guess it may be worth checking.

I was able to access other sites, so it wasn't on my side (or at least it wasn't close to me).

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

Keep the updates coming. Thanks

 

[DevilsAvocado]

Several minutes ago I got 502 Bad Gateway error ...

We are on the same side of the lake, and it looks pretty OK for me, almost as fast as google.com in SF...

[FONT="Courier New"][SIZE="1"]C:\Windows\system32>tracert physicsforums.com

Tracing route to physicsforums.com [74.86.200.109]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2    26 ms    26 ms    26 ms  *********.****.telia.com [***.***.***.***]
  3    31 ms    68 ms    31 ms  s-b1-link.telia.net [80.91.246.230]
  4    31 ms    31 ms    31 ms  s-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.249.70]
  5    39 ms    39 ms    39 ms  kbn-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.247.161]
  6   128 ms   127 ms   128 ms  nyk-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.247.115]
  7   163 ms   162 ms   162 ms  dls-bb1-link.telia.net [213.155.130.65]
  8   164 ms   163 ms   164 ms  te3-3.bbr02.eq01.dal01.networklayer.com [213.248.102.174]
  9   165 ms   165 ms   165 ms  po6.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com [173.192.18.213]
 10   163 ms   163 ms   164 ms  po2.fcr03.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com [66.228.118.190]
 11   171 ms   170 ms   172 ms  physicsforums.com [74.86.200.109]

Trace complete.

C:\Windows\system32>tracert google.com

Tracing route to google.com [74.125.77.104]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2    26 ms    26 ms    25 ms  *********.****.telia.com [***.***.***.***]
  3    31 ms    31 ms    30 ms  s-b1-link.telia.net [80.91.248.195]
  4    31 ms    31 ms    30 ms  s-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.249.70]
  5    46 ms    46 ms    45 ms  hbg-bb1-link.telia.net [213.155.130.159]
  6    51 ms    51 ms    51 ms  adm-bb1-link.telia.net [80.91.252.16]
  7    50 ms    49 ms    73 ms  adm-b4-link.telia.net [80.91.247.67]
  8    55 ms    55 ms    55 ms  google-ic-126116-adm-b4.c.telia.net [80.239.193.182]
  9    51 ms    51 ms    52 ms  209.85.251.14
 10    55 ms    55 ms    55 ms  216.239.49.38
 11    70 ms    71 ms    71 ms  209.85.255.106
 12    55 ms    58 ms    56 ms  ew-in-f104.1e100.net [74.125.77.104]

Trace complete.

C:\Windows\system32>time
The current time is: 14:43:05,38

 

[fluidistic]

Still very slow for me for many (all?) pages. Just like when I posted on March 26 in this thread.
To reply to this thread the "Reply" button hadn't even loaded after 30 s. But there was a "reply" letters so I'm replying this way right now.

 

[DevilsAvocado]

Running fine

[SIZE="1"]C:\Windows\system32>ping -t physicsforums.com

Pinging physicsforums.com [74.86.200.109] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=172ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.86.200.109: bytes=32 time=175ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 74.86.200.109:
    Packets: Sent = 35, Received = 35, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 179ms, Average = 174ms
Control-C
^C

 

[dlgoff]

I've been trying to get here for quite a while now. I've never seen it this slow before. I thought it was my dial-up, but other sites load just fine.

 

[Andre]

Yes intermittent here too. Sometimes prompt and sometimes nothing

 

[DevilsAvocado]

... ehh something 'funny' must be going on ...

Ping statistics for 74.86.200.109:
Packets: Sent = 200, Received = 200, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 179ms, Average = 174ms

C:\Windows\system32>time
The current time is: 22:29:13,96​

= no problems

 

[Evo]

For at least 10 minutes I was getting 100% packet loss on pings to the server.

 

[DevilsAvocado]

For at least 10 minutes I was getting 100% packet loss on pings to the server.

What!?

Do you have dial-up?

 

[Evo]

What!?

Do you have dial-up?

I use tracert.org. I didn't save the pings, but here's a traceroute.

1 75.125.232.57 (75.125.232.57) 0.493 ms 0.380 ms 0.367 ms
2 te1-4.dsr01.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.223.5) 0.637 ms 0.392 ms 0.390 ms
3 e4-2.ibr02.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.245.29) 0.369 ms e4-1.ibr02.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.245.25) 0.330 ms 0.255 ms
4 e3-4.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.53) 5.230 ms 5.369 ms 5.307 ms
5 ae0.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com (70.87.255.170) 5.366 ms 5.270 ms 5.329 ms
6 po6.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.211) 5.577 ms 5.491 ms 5.407 ms
7 po1.fcr03.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.186) 5.425 ms 5.495 ms 5.311 ms
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *

 

[Evo]

I take that back, here's a ping.

PING 74.86.200.109 (74.86.200.109) 56(84) bytes of data.

--- 74.86.200.109 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3000ms

 

[DevilsAvocado]

I use tracert.org. I didn't save the pings, but here's a traceroute.

That is really weird! I just made 1000 ping with only 2 lost and Average = 174ms ...

Then I tried tracert.org and got exactly the same result as you!?

PING physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109) 56(84) bytes of data.

--- physicsforums.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 9001ms


1 75.125.232.57 (75.125.232.57) 0.629 ms 16.701 ms *
2 te1-4.dsr01.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.223.5) 0.536 ms 0.294 ms 0.487 ms
3 e4-1.ibr02.hstntx1.networklayer.com (207.218.245.25) 0.458 ms 0.358 ms 0.477 ms
4 e3-4.ibr04.dllstx3.networklayer.com (70.87.253.53) 5.253 ms 5.416 ms 5.432 ms
5 ae0.bbr01.eq01.dal03.networklayer.com (70.87.255.170) 5.224 ms 5.354 ms 5.450 ms
6 po6.dar01.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.211) 5.447 ms 5.610 ms 5.423 ms
7 po1.fcr03.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.186) 8.194 ms 5.623 ms 5.464 ms
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * * *
22 * * *
23 * * *
24 * * *
25 * * *
26 * * *
27 * * *
28 * * *
29 * * *
30 * * *​

Is this a "U.S. thing" only??

If you run Windows it’s real easy to run ping and trace route yourself, directly from your computer:

1. Go to the Start Menu
2. Click "Run..."
3. Type "command.com" and hit [Enter]
4. At the prompt in the command window, type "ping physicsforums.com" and hit [Enter]
5. Or for trace route, type "tracert physicsforums.com" and hit [Enter]

(Don’t paste your real IP here... )

 

[turbo]

I got 309 errors earlier this afternoon. I'm not sure what that means, but I'm assuming that I couldn't contact PF's server.

 

[Borek]

Same typo of problems here - for about an hour I was not able to refresh/read/post/moderate.

borek@invincible ~ $ ping physicsforums.com
PING physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=206 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=207 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=207 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=206 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=207 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=206 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=206 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=224 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=208 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=10 ttl=48 time=206 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=11 ttl=48 time=205 ms

--- physicsforums.com ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 11 received, 0% packet loss, time 10008ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 205.722/208.482/224.417/5.115 ms
borek@invincible /usr/sbin $ ./traceroute physicsforums.com
traceroute to physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  192.168.0.7 (192.168.0.7)  0.681 ms  0.650 ms  0.562 ms
 2  10.0.0.138 (10.0.0.138)  1.135 ms  0.984 ms  0.957 ms
 3  * * *
 4  xxx.tpnet.pl (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)  23.999 ms  24.799 ms  24.802 ms
 5  hbg-b2-link.telia.net (213.248.89.93)  42.943 ms  42.499 ms  42.097 ms
 6  hbg-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.251.77)  42.213 ms  42.022 ms  41.837 ms
 7  nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.247.127)  126.531 ms  126.287 ms nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.247.129)  125.758 ms
 8  dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.130.65)  163.580 ms  164.175 ms  220.436 ms
 9  * * *
10  po6.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.213)  162.800 ms  163.445 ms  161.869 ms
11  po2.fcr03.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.190)  201.070 ms  202.120 ms  201.762 ms
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *

 

[DevilsAvocado]

Same typo of problems here - for about an hour I was not able to refresh/read/post/moderate.

But your ping seems okay? I don’t understand... I haven’t been logged on that much today, but so far everything has worked "like a dream"... maybe it’s only temporary 'spikes'... but that doesn’t make sense to the "tracert.org experience"...

I’m lost here.

 

[DevilsAvocado]

... looks like "temporary spikes" because now tracert.org is also working fine ...

PING physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=0 ttl=57 time=5.24 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.36 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.26 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.41 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.47 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.69 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=5.41 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=5.39 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=8 ttl=57 time=5.36 ms
64 bytes from physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109): icmp_seq=9 ttl=57 time=5.34 ms

--- physicsforums.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9014ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.244/5.397/5.697/0.148 ms, pipe 2​

EDIT:
Grrrr, now tracert.org is NOT working and the EXTREMELY weird thing is that I start 10 ping in my command window (locally from Sweden) and 10 ping at tracert.org at EXACTLY the same time and it ALWAYS work locally but FAILS on tracert.org??

WT*


I have to leave now, hope it all works out for you guys... or you have to move to Sweden... (don’t forget to bring a big and warm fur)

 

[Jiggy-Ninja]

Same typo of problems here - for about an hour I was not able to refresh/read/post/moderate.

That's an interesting "typo" of typo.

 

[Borek]

That's an interesting "typo" of typo.

Yep, I wanted to correct it, but it was already quoted.

 

[Borek]

Same problem again - when I tried to log to PF this morning I got the 502 Bad Gateway for about half an hour or more:

502 Bad Gateway
nginx

So I pinged & tracerouted:

borek@invincible /usr/sbin $ ping -c 10 physicsforums.com
PING physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109) 56(84) bytes of data.

--- physicsforums.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 8998ms

borek@invincible /usr/sbin $ ./traceroute physicsforums.com
traceroute to physicsforums.com (74.86.200.109), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  192.168.0.7 (192.168.0.7)  0.622 ms  0.580 ms  0.560 ms
 2  10.0.0.138 (10.0.0.138)  1.003 ms  0.971 ms  0.951 ms
 3  * * *
 4  xxxx.tpnet.pl (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)  172.260 ms  26.873 ms  24.362 ms
 5  hbg-b2-link.telia.net (213.248.89.93)  39.412 ms  40.807 ms  39.857 ms
 6  hbg-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.246.6)  40.333 ms  39.601 ms  40.851 ms
 7  nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.247.129)  124.608 ms  125.043 ms nyk-bb1-link.telia.net (80.91.247.127)  127.625 ms
 8  dls-bb1-link.telia.net (213.155.130.65)  163.777 ms  166.940 ms  163.813 ms
 9  * * *
10  po6.dar02.sr01.dal01.networklayer.com (173.192.18.213)  165.091 ms  167.359 ms  164.045 ms
11  po2.fcr03.sr04.dal01.networklayer.com (66.228.118.190)  164.228 ms  163.965 ms  164.488 ms
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  * * *
17  * * *
18  * * *
19  * * *
20  * * *
21  * * *
22  * * *
23  * * *
24  * * *
25  * * *
26  * * *
27  * * *
28  * * *
29  * * *
30  * * *
borek@invincible /usr/sbin $ date
Fri Apr  8 08:50:09 CEST 2011
borek@invincible /usr/sbin $

I even finally registered at FaceBook to be able to report problems to Greg, but they disappeared before I did. O tempora, o mores.

It worked for some time, then stopped, just when I was trying to post this message. I had to go away, now I am back - it works again.

Doesn't look good if you ask me.

 

[OmCheeto]

I'll bet you it's the Koch brothers. They're behind everything nowadays.

 

[dlgoff]

Yesterday I got a AVAST WARNING that it blocked some sort of online threat here on PF. I was logged in and don't remember what forum page it happened on. And before I could investigate what the threat was, the AVAST warning message pop-up giving a link for information ended.

If it happens again, I'll will try to find out what it is and post here.

 

[Lancelot59]

Yesterday I got a AVAST WARNING that it blocked some sort of online threat here on PF. I was logged in and don't remember what forum page it happened on. And before I could investigate what the threat was, the AVAST warning message pop-up giving a link for information ended.

If it happens again, I'll will try to find out what it is and post here.

I haven't had that issue come up yet. Haven't visited the site using windows for a while.