Smolin's Scientific American article on LQG

In summary, the conversation discusses the individual's desire to understand Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) at a deeper level and their confusion regarding the SU(2) aspect of it. They mention finding a helpful article by Lee Smolin on LQG, which delves into spin foams and uses integers to represent volumes and areas. They also mention finding a resource by John Baez that simplifies the concept of spin networks and spin foams using just ten slides. Some additional comments are made about the usefulness of these slides, though they may need to be updated.
  • #1
bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
6,724
429
I would like to step up from the pop-sci level of understanding LQG to something more like a real physicist's understanding, but one thing that's hanging me up is the SU(2) stuff, which I don't understand, even at a hand-wavy level. Falling back to the pop-sci level to regroup, I remembered that Lee Smolin had an article on LQG, "Atoms of Space and Time," Scientific American, Jan 2004. Its discussion of spin foams is actually more detailed than in his pop-sci book Three Roads to Quantum Gravity. In the diagrams in the paper, the nodes and lines are labeled with integers representing volumes and areas. How would those integers relate to the SU(2) stuff?

[EDIT] After posting the above, I found this, which seems to help a lot: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/

[EDIT] This paper by Smolin is also helping me to understand the Baez talk: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9702030
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
bcrowell said:
...
[EDIT] After posting the above, I found this, which seems to help a lot: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/
...
The first 10 slides are a gem. They give concise clear explanation with simple examples, for anyone with a few basic linear algebra concepts (a finite dimensional vectorspace V and its dual V*, a group representation p and its dual p*, tensor product of two vectorspaces, and very little else!) Only two or three sentences per slide, and a simple picture. Baez makes it soooo simple!

I saw those some years back and forgot what a valuable resource those few slides represent, thank for posting the link.

The three other slides in the set don't seem as self-explanatory--they need the lecturer talking. Also they might like to be brought up-to-date (now that the Barrett-Crane spinfoam vertex formula has been replaced a revised vertex formula due to people with initials EPRL-FK.) But the first ten are a great way into the spin-network/spinfoam idea.

Just ten little JPGs :biggrin:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam01.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam02.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam03.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam04.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam05.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam06.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam07.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam08.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam09.jpg
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/foam/foam10.jpg
 
Last edited:

1. What is Smolin's Scientific American article about LQG?

Smolin's Scientific American article is about loop quantum gravity (LQG), a theory that attempts to reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics.

2. What are the main ideas presented in Smolin's article?

Smolin's article presents the main ideas of loop quantum gravity, including the concept of space-time being made up of discrete, indivisible units called loops, and the idea that gravity is not a fundamental force but rather emerges from the fabric of space-time itself.

3. How does LQG differ from other theories of quantum gravity?

LQG differs from other theories of quantum gravity, such as string theory, in its approach to quantizing space-time. While string theory posits tiny vibrating strings as the building blocks of the universe, LQG suggests that space-time itself is quantized into discrete units.

4. What implications does LQG have for our understanding of the universe?

LQG has several implications for our understanding of the universe, including the potential resolution of the singularity problem in black holes, the possibility of a quantum theory of the Big Bang, and the potential for a fully unified theory of physics.

5. What are some current challenges and criticisms of LQG?

Some current challenges and criticisms of LQG include the difficulty of incorporating matter into the theory, the lack of experimental evidence to support its claims, and the potential for inconsistencies with other established theories such as general relativity.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
9K
Replies
63
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Poll
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top