Smoothness of curve via Implicit Function THeroem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the smoothness of the curve defined by the implicit function F(x,y) = (x² + y²)(y - x² - 1). The set S = {(x,y): F(x,y) = 0} is identified as smooth everywhere except at the point (0,0). The curve y = f(x) is smooth along the parabola, while x = f(y) fails to be solvable near (0,1) due to the presence of both positive and negative x-values for the same y-value. This indicates that a true inverse function cannot be defined in that neighborhood.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of implicit functions and the Implicit Function Theorem
  • Familiarity with the concepts of gradients and smoothness in calculus
  • Knowledge of parametric equations and their derivatives
  • Basic graphing skills for visualizing curves and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Implicit Function Theorem in detail to understand conditions for smoothness
  • Learn about the properties of gradients and their role in determining curve behavior
  • Explore the concept of inverse functions and conditions for their existence
  • Investigate parametric equations and conditions for smoothness, particularly focusing on derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone studying differential geometry or the properties of curves defined by implicit functions.

trap101
Messages
339
Reaction score
0
So I have to determine whether the set S = {(x,y): F(x,y) = 0} is a smooth curve, draw a sketch, examine the nautrue of ∇F = 0. Near which points of S is S the graph of a function y = f(x) and x = f(y)

F(x,y) = (x2+y2)(y-x2-1)

Attempt:

So it is the union of a point and the parabola y = 1+x2. Not an issue.

S is smooth everywhere except at the point (0,0)

y=f(x) is smooth all on the parabola

(here's my issue) x= f(y) near any point except (0,1)

I know this point is the y-int of my parabola, but why is x = f(y) not solveable here? or does it mean the curve is not smooth there? Because graphically everything looks fine.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If [itex]y= x^2+ 1[/itex], then [itex]x= \pm \sqrt{y- 1}[/itex] so f does not have a true "inverse". You can, of course, invert it "near points", that is, in some neigborhood of the point as long as x, for that point, is either positive or negative. For x= 0, The set, S, contains both (0, 1) and (0, 0). In no neighborhood of (0, 1) can we define x as a function of y because, again, there are both positive and negative values of x corresponding to the same value of x. And, of course, about (0, 0) there is no neighborhood in which we can define x as a function of y.
 
HallsofIvy said:
For x= 0, The set, S, contains both (0, 1) and (0, 0). In no neighborhood of (0, 1) can we define x as a function of y because, again, there are both positive and negative values of x corresponding to the same value of x. And, of course, about (0, 0) there is no neighborhood in which we can define x as a function of y.


So what your saying there is that in that neighborhood of (0,1) any "y" value that I choose is going to give me both a negative and positive answer so it would not be possible for me to construct a function at that point?




I have another question in terms of parametric equations and the condition f'(t) = 0:

Same scenario as above but f(t) = (t^3-1, t^3+1)

So I've done everything, but when I take the derivative I get the point (-1,1) which should imply that the curve is not "smooth" at that point, but it is...why?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K