SN1 Rxn: is hyrdride shift major product or the LG position?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the comparison between the stability of products formed from a hydride shift versus the leaving group (LG) position in a nucleophilic substitution reaction (SN1). It concludes that while the hydride shift requires additional activation energy, the resulting tertiary carbocation is thermodynamically more stable than the secondary carbocation formed at the LG position. Therefore, under thermodynamic control, the product from the hydride shift will be favored. However, if the reaction conditions favor kinetic control, the original LG position may yield a faster product formation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SN1 reaction mechanisms
  • Knowledge of carbocation stability (secondary vs tertiary)
  • Familiarity with activation energy concepts
  • Concept of thermodynamic vs kinetic control in chemical reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mechanisms of SN1 reactions in detail
  • Learn about carbocation rearrangements and their implications
  • Research thermodynamic and kinetic control in organic reactions
  • Explore the role of activation energy in reaction pathways
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and anyone studying reaction mechanisms and carbocation stability in nucleophilic substitution reactions.

AMan24
Messages
58
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


So LG is on 2° position, and you have a hydride shift. So you form one product on 2° and one product on 3°.

Which product will be major which will be minor?

XwrrTZ5.jpg


Homework Equations


none.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know hydride shift will be more major than a methide shift, because it's not as energetically costly. But for hydride shift vs original LG position (2°), I'm not really sure. I know it does take extra energy to have the hydride shift, so that's making me think original LG position (2°) will be more major than the hydride shift. But i also know that 3° is better than 2°, so I'm really not sure
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The extra energy required for the hydride shift to occur is merely the activation energy for the hydride shift, which does not change the fact that the tertiary carbocation will be more thermodynamically stable than the secondary carbocation. As long as enough activation energy is available for the hydride shift to occur, the more thermodynamically stable intermediate will be favored (under these conditions the reaction is said to occur under thermodynamic control). Sometimes, chemists will set up reactions to minimize the thermal energy available to promote rearrangements of intermediates to more stable intermediates such that the reaction to form product occurs much more quickly than the rearragement (not sure if that is possible in this case, howerver). Under those conditions, the reaction is said to occur under kinetic control as the major product will be dictated by the relative kinetics or rearrangement or reaction of the intermediate and not the thermodynamic stability of the two intermediates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BergsmaRN and AMan24

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K