Snell's Law: Parallel Polarization Derivation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving expressions for electric fields in parallel polarization using Snell's Law and Maxwell's equations. The user seeks clarification on whether to change the geometry of the planar reflector or the vector expressions of the electric field when transitioning from perpendicular to parallel polarization. The key equations referenced include the curl of the magnetic field H and its relationship to the electric field E, specifically using the equation Del x H = jωE(r). The conclusion emphasizes that altering the vector forms is more straightforward than modifying the geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with Snell's Law
  • Knowledge of wave polarization concepts
  • Basic vector calculus, particularly curl operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric field expressions for parallel polarization
  • Explore the implications of duality in electromagnetic theory
  • Learn about the application of curl in vector fields
  • Investigate the geometric interpretations of wave polarization
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, optics, and wave propagation. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of wave polarization and its mathematical derivations.

Brianrofl
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a plane-wave incident upon a planar interface that is perpendicularly polarized with an electric field directed out of the page in the y-hat direction, perpendicular to the x-z plane of incidence. An image of the incident plane:

Capture.PNG


I'm also given the general expressions for the incident, reflected, and transmitted waves for perpendicular polarization:

Capture.PNG


Some relevant eqns (just maxwell equations and solutions):

Capture.PNG

Alright, so what I need to do here is obtain the expressions of E for a parallel polarization, rather than perpendicular. The solution should come from duality, which I assume also comes from maxwell equations.

What I do know is that the solution is obtained from the perpendicular incidence of H. Do I simply use the above maxwell equation Del x H = jweE(r), and take the curl of each H(x,z) equation to obtain E for the parallel case?

I'm not looking for the solution, but if someone could just point me in the right direction here I'd appreciate it.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    6.1 KB · Views: 763
Physics news on Phys.org
When you change to parallel polarization, are you changing your planar reflector from the x-y plane to the y-z plane, or are you changing your expression of
E from ##\vec E_{inc}(x,z) = \hat y E_0 f(x,z) ## to ##\vec E_{inc}(y,z) = \hat x E_0 g(y,z) ##?
Make that clear first, then see what changes need to occur in your forms. I think it is easier to change the vector forms rather than the geometry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
824
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K