So I am curious how many PFers own firearms here.

  • Thread starter Thread starter cronxeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curious
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the ownership and experiences of firearms among members of the Physics Forums community. Participants share details about the types of guns they own, their shooting practices, and their wishlists for future acquisitions. The conversation includes personal anecdotes related to shooting, hunting, and modifications to firearms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express curiosity about the number of firearms owned by others and the types of guns in their collections.
  • One member mentions competing in Trap Shooting events and lists a variety of firearms they own, including a Winchester 30-30 and an AK-47.
  • Another participant shares their experience of not being able to access public ranges due to membership restrictions and personal disabilities.
  • A participant describes their enjoyment of shooting an AR-15 and a rented Ruger .22, highlighting the affordability of ammunition.
  • Some members discuss their hunting practices, mentioning specific firearms used for deer and bird hunting.
  • One participant reflects on a past collection of Winchester lever-action rifles, expressing nostalgia and regret for selling them.
  • Several members share their wishlists for firearms, including specific models like the Beretta Px4 Storm and M4A1.
  • One participant recounts a story about finding historical firearms in a friend's home, adding a historical context to the discussion.
  • Another member mentions their firearms being confiscated and shares details about the guns they previously owned, including a Ruger Super Blackhawk and a Mossberg 500.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects a variety of personal experiences and preferences regarding firearms, with no clear consensus on specific models or practices. Participants express differing views on the types of firearms that are desirable or practical, and some share conflicting opinions about the necessity of certain calibers.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various limitations, such as access to shooting ranges, personal disabilities affecting shooting frequency, and the historical context of certain firearms. There are also references to personal anecdotes that may not be universally applicable.

  • #31


I'm a pacifist too. I own guns to hunt with. I watched somebody run a fox over on purpose and not even stop to take the hide a couple days ago and it made me kind of sad to see something die for nothing, so I'm not by any means a sports hunter either.

A moose is enough meat for a whole winter; that's a lot of savings for me.
edit: not to mention healthier and tastier than angus beef.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32


Pythagorean said:
I'm a pacifist too. I own guns to hunt with. I watched somebody run a fox over on purpose and not even stop to take the hide a couple days ago and it made me kind of sad to see something die for nothing, so I'm not by any means a sports hunter either.

A moose is enough meat for a whole winter; that's a lot of savings for me.
edit: not to mention healthier and tastier than angus beef.

Nothing dies for nothing. Every time some carcass shows up in the forest it feeds the entire forest. Every time some human shoots a moose, it only feeds his fat lazy bottom. You want to hunt a moose like a real man? Grab a survival knife and charge at him.
 
  • #33


cronxeh said:
...Every time some human shoots a moose, it only feeds his fat lazy bottom. You want to hunt a moose like a real man? Grab a survival knife and charge at him.

Hmmmmm. Why the knife? The moose isn't carrying a weapon. You can't have it both ways.
 
  • #34


Averagesupernova said:
Hmmmmm. Why the knife? The moose isn't carrying a weapon. You can't have it both ways.

He's got antlers
 
  • #35


cronxeh said:
You want to hunt a moose like a real man? Grab a survival knife and charge at him.

so real man = stupid man, or...?
 
  • #36


Pythagorean said:
so real man = stupid man, or...?

Man strong enough to stab a moose with a knife. Efficient and fast and the food doesn't taste of lead pellets.
 
  • #37


cronxeh said:
Man strong enough to stab a moose with a knife. Efficient and fast and the food doesn't taste of lead pellets.

Neither does a moose shot in the head. They also don't suffer while they're laying in the road, bleeding out after gettin' runned over. Oh wait, the moose, man, the moose.
 
  • #38


Pythagorean said:
Neither does a moose shot in the head. They also don't suffer while they're laying in the road, bleeding out after gettin' runned over. Oh wait, the moose, man, the moose.

Sense. Make it
 
  • #39


cronxeh said:
Sense. Make it

Says the one claiming real men charge moose with knives. The bleeding out line was referring to the fox I mentioned that you first replied to.
 
  • #40


Wow, thank you cronxeh. Through this conversation, I've a new found respect for Chi Meson. I will never teach high school.
 
  • #41


Gokul43201 said:
Ugh! I thought that might be smaller than direct Joule heat and/or limited mostly to the projectile. What material are rail gun bullets made of?

Edit: Oh wait, you're saying the capacitors will overheat? Hmm, that sounds possible. I didn't think the wire gauge was going to be the issue - which is what my argument above is for.

Not just temp, the ESR of the caps limits the current. Same with inductance, though not current limiting, the current rise time became problematic. Of course one still needs a fast current discharge in either case. But we never used the solenoid approach because the calculations showed there was a problem early on.

Not such a problem if one has a long enough barrel, but this was based on the desired length of the barrel, or rails.
 
Last edited:
  • #42


A whole bunch of posts that were better suited for P&WA (if at all) have been deleted, along with responses to them.
 
  • #43


I wonder. Since I can't get concealed carry permit in NYC, is it possible to store your gun in a safety deposit, or some kind of a specialized storage unit, somewhere in PA, CT or upstate NY?

Or just say screw it and go to Bennington, Vermont and buy/store everything there?
 
Last edited:
  • #44


cronxeh said:
I wonder. Since I can't get concealed carry permit in NYC, is it possible to store your gun in a safety deposit, or some kind of a specialized storage unit, somewhere in PA, CT or upstate NY?

Or just say screw it and go to Bennington, Vermont and buy/store everything there?

Heck, you can't even get a long-gun permit in NYC. Not really. They just sit on the application for years.
 
  • #45


rolerbe said:
Heck, you can't even get a long-gun permit in NYC. Not really. They just sit on the application for years.

The only state that sucks more than New York, is Commiefornia. Maryland is pretty bad too. Libtard politicians there.
 
  • #46


cronxeh said:
I wonder. Since I can't get concealed carry permit in NYC, is it possible to store your gun in a safety deposit, or some kind of a specialized storage unit, somewhere in PA, CT or upstate NY?

Or just say screw it and go to Bennington, Vermont and buy/store everything there?

Why would you need a safe deposit box to store a gun? This comment makes no sense.
 
  • #47


Cyrus said:
Why would you need a safe deposit box to store a gun? This comment makes no sense.

Think: Bourne Identity etc..
 
  • #48


Cyrus said:
The only state that sucks more than New York, is Commiefornia. Maryland is pretty bad too. Libtard politicians there.

Actually, at least for long guns, Maryland is OK. Just moved from there and they have several really nice shotgun ranges for trap, skeet, sporting clays, etc (a minor passion of mine), and I had no problems at all. Just can't bring my pretty over-under here to NYC, and have to drive out an hour or so into NJ to get to a range, to use a worn, unfamiliar range-loaner. :-(
 
  • #49


zomgwtf said:
Think: Bourne Identity etc..

What?
 
  • #50


rolerbe said:
Actually, at least for long guns, Maryland is OK. Just moved from there and they have several really nice shotgun ranges for trap, skeet, sporting clays, etc (a minor passion of mine), and I had no problems at all. Just can't bring my pretty over-under here to NYC, and have to drive out an hour or so into NJ to get to a range, to use a worn, unfamiliar range-loaner. :-(

Having an open carry or cc is not an option for me as a MD resident. I need to vote these idiots all out of office.
 
  • #51


Cyrus said:
Having an open carry or cc is not an option for me as a MD resident. I need to vote these idiots all out of office.

Maryland is listed as a "licensed open carry" state. Not sure what the license entails.

I do agree with the latter part of your statement in any event..:smile:
 
  • #52


It should be Vermont carry or gtfo office
 
  • #53


Extraordinary. You guys are scientists. Do you see any correlation between your ease of access to this kind of machine and the statistics of deaths by shooting in the USA?
 
  • #54


Ken Natton said:
Extraordinary. You guys are scientists. Do you see any correlation between your ease of access to this kind of machine and the statistics of deaths by shooting in the USA?

Take a hike.
 
  • #55


Ken Natton said:
Extraordinary. You guys are scientists. Do you see any correlation between your ease of access to this kind of machine and the statistics of deaths by shooting in the USA?

Do you see any failed logic in the assumption that laws will prevent criminals from getting guns?
 
  • #56


Ken Natton said:
Extraordinary. You guys are scientists. Do you see any correlation between your ease of access to this kind of machine and the statistics of deaths by shooting in the USA?
I have a number of handguns, including 2 pretty potent semi-automatics for home defense. Haven't killed anybody yet. If you live this far out in the woods (at least 20-30 minutes away from police response to a 911 call), you'd better have some means of self-defense.

I have only pointed a pistol at a person once in my life. My wife heard an intruder downstairs, so I padded down there naked with my .357 Python, swung around the divider to the kitchen, and found myself with that gun pointed right between his eyes. A not-too-close relative with a penchant for B&E and burglary. He stammered something about having car trouble and needing to use the phone. I gave him 2 seconds to get out that side door. Fixed his car, too, apparently. He was able to squeal the tires when he slewed off the gravel driveway onto the pavement. Creep!
 
  • #57


Ken Natton said:
Extraordinary. You guys are scientists. Do you see any correlation between your ease of access to this kind of machine and the statistics of deaths by shooting in the USA?

duhImage1.jpg


Look at the deaths for motor vehicles if you really want your mind blown.
 
  • #58


Ignorant_twit said:
Look at the deaths for motor vehicles if you really want your mind blown.
That is a really dumb comparison. Why don't you pull up deaths from heart problems while you're at it, the statistics are just as meaningful in a discussion about guns.
 
  • #59


Ken Natton said:
Extraordinary. You guys are scientists. Do you see any correlation between your ease of access to this kind of machine and the statistics of deaths by shooting in the USA?

For what it's worth, I agree. This whole conversation is another fascinating reminder of the cultural gulfs that can exist in this world.

Where I live, guns for hunting would be socially acceptable - but I hardly know anyone who does, and owning a gun does make them seem a little "weird". It is like they are into S+M or something.

Allowing people to own guns purely designed for killing people just seems sick. Detached from reality. Who would want to own a people-killer? I mean why?
 
  • #60


apeiron said:
For what it's worth, I agree. This whole conversation is another fascinating reminder of the cultural gulfs that can exist in this world.

Where I live, guns for hunting would be socially acceptable - but I hardly know anyone who does, and owning a gun does make them seem a little "weird". It is like they are into S+M or something.

Allowing people to own guns purely designed for killing people just seems sick. Detached from reality. Who would want to own a people-killer? I mean why?

Good for you, wrong thread to post this in. Move along, nothing for you to post here.

For what it's worth, we tend to think of anti-gun advocates as ignorat, as Rose O'Donell supporting, libtards.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K