Show that (z1 + z2)/(1 + z1z2) is real when |z1| = |z2| = 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dank2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
47 replies · 6K views
is z1.z2 =1 or -1 ??
if z1.z2 = -1 then the number is not defined !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sahil Kukreja said:
is z1.z2 =1 or -1 ??
if z1.z2 = -1 then the number is not defined !
=/= not =
 
Work to do, therefore ! It's almost more efficient to teach you this ##e^{i\phi}## than to drudge through all this cos sin and such...
But I can be hired to do your work if you pay better than my boss ... :smile:.
 
put z1= cosa + isina
z2= cosb + isinb
simplify
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dank2
I haven't learn using e yet, is it possible to do it with r(cosx+isinx) ?
 
Dank2 said:
I haven't learn using e yet, is it possible to do it with r(cosx+isinx) ?
In other questions e can be useful, but in this question you can use both the ways and get the answer in same time( actually same efficiency)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dank2
Sahil Kukreja said:
I have solved it
9ecf6466_0c0d_4475_b9dc_5e68f563af48.jpg
It is a violation of PF rules for you to post this. You are not supposed to present solutions!
 
Dank2 said:
I haven't learn using e yet, is it possible to do it with r(cosx+isinx) ?[/QUOT
Sahil Kukreja said:
In other questions e can be useful, but in this question you can use both the ways and get the answer in same time( actually same efficiency)
BvU said:
Work to do, therefore ! It's almost more efficient to teach you this ##e^{i\phi}## than to drudge through all this cos sin and such...
But I can be hired to do your work if you pay better than my boss ... :smile:.
it's just 4 terms that needs to be organized, cause we don't matter about the real part
 
Ray Vickson said:
It is a violation of PF rules for you to post this. You are not supposed to present solutions!
Sorry. I have deleted the solution now
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dank2
I have another method to solve and it is a lot easier:- (it just solves in three steps)

Hint:-
z' --> conjugate of z
if z-z' = 0 then z is purely real

also use that since |z1|=|z2|=1
then z1=1/z1' and z2=1/z2'
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dank2
Now, I have a third method to solve :-
since |z1|=|z2|=1
then z1=1/z1' and z2=1/z2'

put this in the equation and use your previous knowledge to get the answer
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dank2 and BvU
Sahil Kukreja said:
I have another method to solve and it is a lot easier:- (it just solves in three steps)

Hint:-
z' --> conjugate of z
if z-z' = 0 then z is purely real

also use that since |z1|=|z2|=1
then z1=1/z1' and z2=1/z2'
Very nice! it came so smooth, thank you sir, and also, for all the others that helped . i didn't even use z1 =1/z1'.
 
Dank2 said:
Very nice! it came so smooth, thank you sir, and also, for all the others that helped . i didn't even use z1 =1/z1'.
its good to remember that z.z' = ## |z|^2 ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dank2
Sahil Kukreja said:
its good to remember that z.z' = ## |z|^2 ##
yes i followed that, and all the terms in the numerator left was z1-z1' + z2-z2' which is ofc real, and denominator was 1+z1z2 + conjugate(z1z2), which is also real.
 
Dank2 said:
Very nice! it came so smooth, thank you sir, and also, for all the others that helped . i didn't even use z1 =1/z1'.
I learned from this too : even though you have found a way through (and I thought the ##e^{i\phi}## was pretty efficient o:) ) , it's good to keep an eye open for alternatives, and Sahil had no trouble pointing out a very good one !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Sahil Kukreja and Dank2
Dank2 said:
yes i followed that, and all the terms in the numerator left was z1-z1' + z2-z2' which is ofc real, and denominator was 1+z1z2 + conjugate(z1z2), which is also real.

z1-z1' + z2-z2' is not purely real, its purely imaginary.
z=(z1+z2)/(1+z1z2)
if you put z1=1/z1' and z2=1/z2' then you must have gotten z=z'
which implies z is purely real.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dank2
Sahil Kukreja said:
z1-z1' + z2-z2' is not purely real, its purely imaginary.
z=(z1+z2)/(1+z1z2)
if you put z1=1/z1' and z2=1/z2' then you must have gotten z=z'
which implies z is purely real.
Ok , now i know that i had to use that z1=1/z1'

so it came up 1/z'+1/z+1/z2+1/z2', and i forgot to add |z1z2|^2 at the denominator in message #45