Socialist Health Care: Does it Work?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter t-money
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Health
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of socialist health care systems, particularly in comparison to the U.S. health care system. Participants explore various aspects such as infant mortality rates, life expectancy, and the overall quality of health care in countries with universal coverage versus the U.S. system.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that socialist health care does not work in Europe and Canada, questioning its viability in the U.S.
  • Others challenge this view, requesting evidence to support claims about the superiority of U.S. health metrics compared to those of countries with universal health care.
  • Links to various articles and videos are shared, with some participants asserting that these sources provide valuable insights into the debate.
  • Concerns are raised about the definitions and statistics used in measuring health outcomes, particularly regarding infant mortality and the impact of factors like premature births.
  • Some participants highlight the high tax rates in Sweden and the implications for public services, suggesting that comparisons between the U.S. and Sweden may not be straightforward.
  • There are claims that U.S. health care programs like Medicaid and Medicare have been beneficial despite criticisms of their effectiveness.
  • Participants express skepticism about the ability of U.S. politicians to effectively reform the health care system, citing historical failures.
  • Some argue that universal health care is not synonymous with socialism and emphasize its role in enhancing workforce productivity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the effectiveness of socialist health care systems and the U.S. health care system. The discussion reflects a range of opinions and uncertainties about the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants express differing views on the reliability of sources and statistics, and there is a lack of agreement on how to define and measure health care outcomes. The discussion includes references to specific countries and their health care systems, but comparisons are complicated by differing national contexts.

  • #121
mheslep said:
Yes interesting http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_politics_in_Switzerland" where every citizen owns a gun and, if the authorities come to your house and demand to see your gun and you do NOT have it, they arrest you.:approve:

I'm not sure if they've repealed this yet, but they used to require that every building, including houses, have bomb shelters. Most people put a bar and a pool table or hot tub in them :biggrin:

Regarding Swiss healthcare, it is universal I believe, but it isn't for the most part publicly-funded, it is a combination of a publicly-funded system (University of Geneva), subsized private, and totally private systems (private doctors and medical practices). I think though that it is law that all citizens have to buy insurance.
I can't vouch for other countries, but this is pretty much what Canada has too. I don't know the details of the Swiss system, but maybe somebody on this forum is from that country and can compare:
-all family doctors are private
-all specialists not located in a hospital are private
-all dental is private
-all eye care is private
-all blood testing, urine testing, x-ray, mri, cardiogram, ekg, and other things of this nature that are not in a hospital are private
-doctors who have private practices are not allowed to work in hospitals
-doctors who work in hospitals are not allowed to work in their own practice
-doctors can switch between hospital or private any time they want, but they can't work in both at the same time (conflict of interest apparently)
-most private health procedures are paid for by showing your health care card; I can't think of anything that isn't covered, but I know they exist
-everybody is (somewhat) required to buy government insurance. I wasn't even asked if I wanted health care, they just started sending me a bill for $120 every 3 months. You can opt out if you want, but that seems like a really bad idea.
-everybody has the option of getting extra government subsidized insurance (blue cross) to help pay for dental, eye, and drugs. It's not required, but it's a good idea. In Alberta it's $41/month for a family, or I think $20 for an individual.

Where's Monique from? Doesn't she live pretty close to Switzerland?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #122
turbo-1 said:
You are badly misinformed. In the US, if you own a firearm that can fire continuously while the trigger is depressed, you have to have purchased a class 3 license before taking possession of it, and you have to keep that permit current and pay fees, and you have to notify the ATF when you want to transport that gun to a location not specified on your permit. Practically identical weapons which have to be fired with individual trigger-pulls used to be exempted until a bunch of nuts pushed through laws forbidding things like flash-suppressors, folding stocks, and other features that might might make the semi-automatic rifles "look" like the full-auto military guns.

Switzerland's laws are structured more toward the maintenance of a citizen militia, in which an invasion/incursion can be countered with well-armed quick-reaction forces. I would NOT want to attempt a home invasion of a Swiss home for any reason.

Yeah, Switzerland seems more "American" than America itself in some ways it seems.

But yeah those laws you said I think were in line with what I was thinking, point is, if you own such firearms in America, the government keeps an eye on you.
 
  • #123
All my brothers and sisters live in Holland, are married with kids and their social healthcare system is awesome. They have no complaints whatsoever. hg
 
  • #124
ShawnD said:
I can't vouch for other countries, but this is pretty much what Canada has too. I don't know the details of the Swiss system, but maybe somebody on this forum is from that country and can compare:
-doctors who have private practices are not allowed to work in hospitals
-doctors who work in hospitals are not allowed to work in their own practice
-most private health procedures are paid for by showing your health care card; I can't think of anything that isn't covered, but I know they exist

i think it changes between provinces also. i live in ontario and my family doctor is at the hospital almost every night checking on patients (i think the people she checks on might just be patients from her family practice though). also i know that ambulance, air lifting and some rehabilitation programs are not covered entirely by the ontario health insurance plan. I am fairly sure a ride in an ambulance is $100, i don't know about the air lifting but a 2 month stay at a hospital's brain injury rehabilitation facility is about $5,000. all 3 are covered totally by blue cross
 
  • #125
hubertg said:
All my brothers and sisters live in Holland, are married with kids and their social healthcare system is awesome. They have no complaints whatsoever. hg
In 2003 Holland instituted some major reforms of its health care system so its not clear what it means to say the care there is 'awesome'. It use to be awesome but not now? It use to be terrible but now its awesome? They use a private insurance plan to bypass the waiting lists and that is awesome?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 154 ·
6
Replies
154
Views
21K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K