SOHCAHTOA: Seemingly Simple, Conceivably Complex

  • Context: Insights 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kuruman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 6K views
Messages
16,040
Reaction score
9,254
What is SOHCAHTOA
SOHCAHTOA is a mnemonic acronym used in trigonometry to remember the relationships between the sides and angles of right triangles. Each letter in “SOHCAHTOA” stands for a specific trigonometric function:

Sine (sin): The sine of an angle in a right triangle is defined as the ratio of the length of the side opposite that angle to the length of the hypotenuse (the longest side). Mathematically, sin(θ) = opposite/hypotenuse.
Cosine (cos): The cosine of an angle is defined as the ratio of the length of the adjacent side (the side next to the angle but not the hypotenuse) to the length of the hypotenuse. Mathematically, cos(θ) = adjacent/hypotenuse.
Tangent (tan): The tangent of an angle is defined as the ratio of the length of the side opposite that angle to the length of the adjacent side. Mathematically, tan(θ) = opposite/adjacent.

SOHCAHTOA is a helpful tool for students and learners to quickly recall these trigonometric relationships when working with right...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU and Greg Bernhardt
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no question. This is just a link to his web page.

By the way, you don't have to use Taylor's series to get the derivative of the exponential. With [itex]f(x)= a^x[/itex], [itex]f(x+h)= a^{x+h}= a^xa^h[/itex] so the "difference quotient" is [itex]/frac{a^xa^h- a^x}{h}= a^x\left(\frac{a^h- 1}{h}\right)[/itex]. The derivative is given by [itex]\frac{da^x}{dx}= a^x\left(\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{a^{h}- 1}{h}[/itex]. The limit depends only on a, not on x- it is a constant with respect to x. Writing that constant as [itex]C_a[/itex], the derivative is [itex]C_a a^x[/itex].

Of course, [itex]C_a[/itex] depends on what a is. If, for example, a= 2, the difference quotient is [itex]\frac{2^h- 1}{h}[/itex]. Taking h= 0.001, we get the approximation [itex]\frac{2^{0.001}- 1}{0.001}= \frac{1.0006934- 1}{0.001}= 0.6934[/itex] for [itex]C_2[/itex]. Similarly for a= 3, and taking h= 0.001, [itex]\frac{3^{0.001}- 1}{0.001}= \frac{1.001099- 1}{0.001}= 1.0099[/tex] as an approximation for [itex]C_3[/itex]. <br /> <br /> Notice that [itex]C_2[/itex] is less than 1 while [itex]C_3[/itex] is larger than 1. So there exist a value of a, between 0 and 1 such that [itex]C_a= 1[/tex]. We define "e" to be equal to that value of a. That is, [tex]frac{d e^x}{dx}= e^x[/tex][/itex][tex].[/tex][/itex]
 
Last edited:
I don't know why I was not allowed to edit the previous post. Hopefully, this will come out correctly!

By the way, you don't have to use Taylor's series to get the derivative of the exponential. With [itex]f(x)= a^x[/itex], [itex]f(x+h)= a^{x+h}= a^xa^h[/itex] so the "difference quotient" is [itex]\frac{a^xa^h- a^x}{h}= a^x\left(\frac{a^h- 1}{h}\right)[/itex]. The derivative is given by [itex]\frac{da^x}{dx}= a^x\left(\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{a^{h}- 1}{h}\right)[/itex]. The limit depends only on a, not on x- it is a constant with respect to x. Writing that constant as [itex]C_a[/itex], the derivative is [itex]C_a a^x[/itex].

Of course, [itex]C_a[/itex] depends on what a is. If, for example, a= 2, the difference quotient is [itex]\frac{2^h- 1}{h}[/itex]. Taking h= 0.001, we get the approximation [itex]\frac{2^{0.001}- 1}{0.001}= \frac{1.0006934- 1}{0.001}= 0.6934[/itex] for [itex]C_2[/itex]. Similarly for a= 3, and taking h= 0.001, [itex]\frac{3^{0.001}- 1}{0.001}= \frac{1.001099- 1}{0.001}= 1.0099[/itex] as an approximation for [itex]C_3[/itex].

Notice that [itex]C_2[/itex] is less than 1 while [itex]C_3[/itex] is larger than 1. So there exist a value of a, between 0 and 1 such that [itex]C_a= 1[/itex]. We define "e" to be equal to that value of a. That is, [itex]\frac{d e^x}{dx}= e^x[/itex].
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TeethWhitener
Another way to handle the exponential is to first define [itex]log(x)= \int_1^x\frac{1}{t}dt[/itex]. We can immediately derive several properties. First, since 1/t is not defined for t= 0, this define log(x) only for x> 0. And then the derivative, 1/x, is positive so log(x) is always increasing. Clearly log(1) is 0 so, since the function is increasing, log(x) is positive for x> 1 and negative for x< 1. It goes to positive infinity for x going to positive infinity and goes to negative infinity for x going to 0.

Most importantly, for our purposes, [itex]log(x^y)= \int_1^{x^y}\frac{1}{t}dt[/itex]. Let [itex]u= t^{1/y}[/itex] so that [itex]t= u^y[/itex] and [itex]dt= yu^{y-1}du[/itex]. When t= 1, u= 1 and when [itex]t= x^y[/itex] [itex]u= x[/tex]. So the integral becomes [itex]\int_1^x\frac{1}{x^y}\left(yu^{y-1}\right)dx= y\int_1^y \frac{1}{u} du= y log(x)[/itex]. <br /> <br /> Since log(x) is an increasing function, from the positive real numbers to all real numbers, it has an inverse function from all real numbers to the positive real numbers. Call that inverse function "exp(x)". If y= log(x) then x= exp(y) and if y= exp(x) then x= log(y). Since the derivative of log(x) is 1/x, the derivative of y= Exp(x) is 1/(1/y)= y= Exp(x). If y= Exp(x) then x= log(y). If x is not 0, [itex]1= \frac{1}{x}log(y)= log(y^{1/x})[/itex]. Going back the other way, [itex]y^{1/x}= Exp(1)[/tex] so [tex]y= (Exp(1)^x[/tex][/itex][tex]. That is, the function, Exp(x), is this number, [itex]Exp(1)[/itex] to the x power. We define "e" to be Exp(1), the number, x, such that log(x)= 1.[/tex][/itex]
 
These may be mathematically equivalent ways. However, put yourself in the shoes of a department curriculum committee that has to decide what is taught when and make recommendations that make pedagogical sense. Would you choose one of your two suggested methods or would you recommend waiting until after students have seen series expansions?
 
jedishrfu said:
I liked the hyperreals approach allowing you to skip the notion of limits initially in Calculus. Keisler's Calculus book goes that route and its arguably more intuitive to students initially than limits are.

https://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html
Agreed. Learning is a drill-down process where you first get an overview and gradually break it down until you fully get it. It makes no sense to me to start with a very detailed account.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Notice that C2C2C_2 is less than 1 while C3C3C_3 is larger than 1. So there exist a value of a, between 0 and 1 such that Ca=1Ca=1C_a= 1. We define "e" to be equal to that value of a. That is, dexdx=exdexdx=ex\frac{d e^x}{dx}= e^x.
If we substitute ##n=1/h## and look for the ##a## for which
$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \left(\frac{a^{1/n}-1}{1/n}\right) = 1$$
with a little rearrangement, we get:
$$a=\lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n$$
which is another definition of ##e## that many people are familiar with.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu