Insights SOHCAHTOA: Seemingly Simple, Conceivably Complex

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuruman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
SOHCAHTOA is a mnemonic that helps in remembering the relationships between the sides and angles of right triangles in trigonometry. It represents three key functions: sine, cosine, and tangent, defined by specific ratios of triangle sides. The sine function relates the opposite side to the hypotenuse, cosine relates the adjacent side to the hypotenuse, and tangent relates the opposite side to the adjacent side. This mnemonic is particularly useful for students learning to solve problems involving right triangles. Understanding SOHCAHTOA simplifies the process of applying trigonometric functions effectively.
kuruman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
15,801
Reaction score
8,973
What is SOHCAHTOA
SOHCAHTOA is a mnemonic acronym used in trigonometry to remember the relationships between the sides and angles of right triangles. Each letter in “SOHCAHTOA” stands for a specific trigonometric function:

Sine (sin): The sine of an angle in a right triangle is defined as the ratio of the length of the side opposite that angle to the length of the hypotenuse (the longest side). Mathematically, sin(θ) = opposite/hypotenuse.
Cosine (cos): The cosine of an angle is defined as the ratio of the length of the adjacent side (the side next to the angle but not the hypotenuse) to the length of the hypotenuse. Mathematically, cos(θ) = adjacent/hypotenuse.
Tangent (tan): The tangent of an angle is defined as the ratio of the length of the side opposite that angle to the length of the adjacent side. Mathematically, tan(θ) = opposite/adjacent.

SOHCAHTOA is a helpful tool for students and learners to quickly recall these trigonometric relationships when working with right...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes BvU and Greg Bernhardt
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you have a question?
 
There is no question. This is just a link to his web page.

By the way, you don't have to use Taylor's series to get the derivative of the exponential. With f(x)= a^x, f(x+h)= a^{x+h}= a^xa^h so the "difference quotient" is /frac{a^xa^h- a^x}{h}= a^x\left(\frac{a^h- 1}{h}\right). The derivative is given by \frac{da^x}{dx}= a^x\left(\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{a^{h}- 1}{h}. The limit depends only on a, not on x- it is a constant with respect to x. Writing that constant as C_a, the derivative is C_a a^x.

Of course, C_a depends on what a is. If, for example, a= 2, the difference quotient is \frac{2^h- 1}{h}. Taking h= 0.001, we get the approximation \frac{2^{0.001}- 1}{0.001}= \frac{1.0006934- 1}{0.001}= 0.6934 for C_2. Similarly for a= 3, and taking h= 0.001, \frac{3^{0.001}- 1}{0.001}= \frac{1.001099- 1}{0.001}= 1.0099[/tex] as an approximation for C_3. <br /> <br /> Notice that C_2 is less than 1 while C_3 is larger than 1. So there exist a value of a, between 0 and 1 such that C_a= 1[/tex]. We define &amp;quot;e&amp;quot; to be equal to that value of a. That is, frac{d e^x}{dx}= e^x.
 
Last edited:
I don't know why I was not allowed to edit the previous post. Hopefully, this will come out correctly!

By the way, you don't have to use Taylor's series to get the derivative of the exponential. With f(x)= a^x, f(x+h)= a^{x+h}= a^xa^h so the "difference quotient" is \frac{a^xa^h- a^x}{h}= a^x\left(\frac{a^h- 1}{h}\right). The derivative is given by \frac{da^x}{dx}= a^x\left(\lim_{h\to 0} \frac{a^{h}- 1}{h}\right). The limit depends only on a, not on x- it is a constant with respect to x. Writing that constant as C_a, the derivative is C_a a^x.

Of course, C_a depends on what a is. If, for example, a= 2, the difference quotient is \frac{2^h- 1}{h}. Taking h= 0.001, we get the approximation \frac{2^{0.001}- 1}{0.001}= \frac{1.0006934- 1}{0.001}= 0.6934 for C_2. Similarly for a= 3, and taking h= 0.001, \frac{3^{0.001}- 1}{0.001}= \frac{1.001099- 1}{0.001}= 1.0099 as an approximation for C_3.

Notice that C_2 is less than 1 while C_3 is larger than 1. So there exist a value of a, between 0 and 1 such that C_a= 1. We define "e" to be equal to that value of a. That is, \frac{d e^x}{dx}= e^x.
 
  • Like
Likes TeethWhitener
Another way to handle the exponential is to first define log(x)= \int_1^x\frac{1}{t}dt. We can immediately derive several properties. First, since 1/t is not defined for t= 0, this define log(x) only for x> 0. And then the derivative, 1/x, is positive so log(x) is always increasing. Clearly log(1) is 0 so, since the function is increasing, log(x) is positive for x> 1 and negative for x< 1. It goes to positive infinity for x going to positive infinity and goes to negative infinity for x going to 0.

Most importantly, for our purposes, log(x^y)= \int_1^{x^y}\frac{1}{t}dt. Let u= t^{1/y} so that t= u^y and dt= yu^{y-1}du. When t= 1, u= 1 and when t= x^y u= x[/tex]. So the integral becomes \int_1^x\frac{1}{x^y}\left(yu^{y-1}\right)dx= y\int_1^y \frac{1}{u} du= y log(x). <br /> <br /> Since log(x) is an increasing function, from the positive real numbers to all real numbers, it has an inverse function from all real numbers to the positive real numbers. Call that inverse function &quot;exp(x)&quot;. If y= log(x) then x= exp(y) and if y= exp(x) then x= log(y). Since the derivative of log(x) is 1/x, the derivative of y= Exp(x) is 1/(1/y)= y= Exp(x). If y= Exp(x) then x= log(y). If x is not 0, 1= \frac{1}{x}log(y)= log(y^{1/x}). Going back the other way, y^{1/x}= Exp(1)[/tex] so y= (Exp(1)^x. That is, the function, Exp(x), is this number, Exp(1) to the x power. We define &amp;quot;e&amp;quot; to be Exp(1), the number, x, such that log(x)= 1.
 
These may be mathematically equivalent ways. However, put yourself in the shoes of a department curriculum committee that has to decide what is taught when and make recommendations that make pedagogical sense. Would you choose one of your two suggested methods or would you recommend waiting until after students have seen series expansions?
 
I liked the hyperreals approach allowing you to skip the notion of limits initially in Calculus. Keisler's Calculus book goes that route and its arguably more intuitive to students initially than limits are.

https://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
jedishrfu said:
I liked the hyperreals approach allowing you to skip the notion of limits initially in Calculus. Keisler's Calculus book goes that route and its arguably more intuitive to students initially than limits are.

https://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html
Agreed. Learning is a drill-down process where you first get an overview and gradually break it down until you fully get it. It makes no sense to me to start with a very detailed account.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Notice that C2C2C_2 is less than 1 while C3C3C_3 is larger than 1. So there exist a value of a, between 0 and 1 such that Ca=1Ca=1C_a= 1. We define "e" to be equal to that value of a. That is, dexdx=exdexdx=ex\frac{d e^x}{dx}= e^x.
If we substitute ##n=1/h## and look for the ##a## for which
$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \left(\frac{a^{1/n}-1}{1/n}\right) = 1$$
with a little rearrangement, we get:
$$a=\lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n$$
which is another definition of ##e## that many people are familiar with.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu
  • #10
There's a similar presentation in John Roe’s “Elementary Geometry” sections 4.1 – 4.4.
https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=Xmb44wyy7gEC
4.1: Dot product
4.2: Pythagorean theorem
4.3: Series definitions of sine and cosine, then defining angle through cosine and the dot product
4.4: SOHCAHTOA
 
Back
Top