Solar eclipses, total and annular

  • Context: Stargazing 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Labguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on solar eclipses, specifically the total eclipse of July 11, 1991, and the annular eclipse of May 10, 1994. The user, Labguy, shared personal experiences and photographs taken during these events, highlighting the importance of being near the center path of totality for optimal viewing. Additionally, Labguy expressed challenges with using the Orion Steady-Pix for afocal photography with an 8-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope, seeking advice on aligning the camera with the eyepiece for better results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar eclipse types: total and annular
  • Familiarity with afocal photography techniques
  • Knowledge of telescope types, specifically Schmidt-Cassegrain
  • Experience with camera equipment, particularly 35mm SLRs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for eyepiece projection photography
  • Learn about optimal positioning for solar eclipse viewing
  • Explore the capabilities of the Orion Steady-Pix for astrophotography
  • Investigate prime focus photography methods with Schmidt-Cassegrain telescopes
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, amateur astrophotographers, and anyone interested in capturing solar eclipses effectively.

Labguy
Science Advisor
Messages
731
Reaction score
7
I like solar eclipses, total and annular:
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Nice pics Labguy! Where did you have to go to see those events?
 
Aether said:
Nice pics Labguy! Where did you have to go to see those events?
The first two are from the "Great Eclipse" of 07/11/1991. For this one, I had to go to lower Baja, Mexico (Cabo San Lucas) to be near the center path of totality. totality was 6 minutes 19 seconds where I was. I think it is about another 130 years or so for one that long.

The second shot of the annular was on 05/10/1994 and the central path was dead-on at 13 miles north of El Paso, Texas. I was going to Phoenix that day anyway so I stopped there and took about 25 photos through a standard ND-5 inconel solar filter.

Two more below from 7/11/91 total. One shows the diamond ring before it split into a double, and the other shows the Chromosphere around almost 360*.
 
Last edited:
Last edited by a moderator:
I recently got the Orion steady-pix for my birthday and I'm have an extremely difficult time trying to use it. I have done afocal photography in the past without and my wife thought it would be easier with the steady-pix. I have a pretty robust 8 inch Schmitt-Cass, but aligning the camera with the eyepiece is a bear. Any suggestions or comments about the Orion steady-pix?
 
Captain Cool Guy said:
I recently got the Orion steady-pix for my birthday and I'm have an extremely difficult time trying to use it. I have done afocal photography in the past without and my wife thought it would be easier with the steady-pix. I have a pretty robust 8 inch Schmitt-Cass, but aligning the camera with the eyepiece is a bear. Any suggestions or comments about the Orion steady-pix?
Sounds like a film camera. That's all I ever used and haven't done any for several years. No CCD for me.

If your camera is a 35mm SLR with removable lens, eyepiece projection is very handy with one of these:

http://www.telescope.com/shopping/p...e=PRODUCT&iMainCat=6&iSubCat=29&iProductID=52

Much easier than the bracket you now have. Plus, with your SCT, you probably have enough focus travel to do prime focus photos at f/10 using just the camera and the scope, no eyepiece and no lens on the camera.
 
I know some of the other methods for my sct but I feel bad because I think that my wife bought me a piece of crap and I just wanted to take at least one good role for her sake and I was wondering if anyone else has learned any techniques or even a procedure for using their steadypix.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
762
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K