Solid cylinder with nonuniform volume charge density?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field generated by a long, non-conducting solid cylinder with a nonuniform volume charge density described by ρ = Ar², where A = 2.5 µC/m⁵. The correct approach to find the electric field at radial distances of 3.2 cm and 5.2 cm involves integrating the charge density to find the enclosed charge, leading to the formula E = (Ar³) / (4ε₀). The initial method proposed by the user was incorrect due to improper integration and missing constants, specifically the factor of 2π in the denominator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and Gauss's Law
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinates and area integrals
  • Basic concepts of charge density and permittivity (ε₀)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Learn about cylindrical coordinate systems and their integration techniques
  • Explore the concept of volume charge density and its implications in electric field calculations
  • Practice problems involving nonuniform charge distributions and electric field derivations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of electric fields generated by nonuniform charge distributions.

LumiKnight
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A long, non conducting, solid cylinder of radius 4.2 cm has a nonuniform volume charge density ρ = Ar^2, a function of the radial distance r from the cylinder axis. A = 2.5 µC/m5.

(a) What is the magnitude of the electric field at a radial distance of 3.2 cm from the axis of the cylinder?

(b) What is the magnitude of the electric field at a radial distance of 5.2 cm from the axis of the cylinder?

Homework Equations



e0 Ø = charge enclosed ; e0 is the permittivity constant 8.85e-12 and Ø can be the flux

e0 E(2π r L) = λ L ; λ is the linear charge density

The Attempt at a Solution

I thought that I could just integrate Ar^2 twice, which would give me λ. Then I could multiply by the height of the cylinder, L. After I did all that I arrived at this:

E=(Ar^3) / (24e0) with e0 being the permittivity constant.
The correct form would have me do this though:

charge enclosed = ∫ 2π r L (Ar^2) dr ; from 0 to r

= 2π L A ∫ r^3 dr ; from 0 to r

If you integrate that and solve for E you get this:

E=(Ar^3) / (4e0) <----- This gives the correct answer.Can someone explain to me why the method I'm using wrong? Is there some constant I am missing in my method? Or is it just wrong? And this is also my first post here on Physics Forums? Please tell me if I am doing something wrong so I can correct it in any future post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to physics forums! Or at least, congrats on your first post on physics forums :)

LumiKnight said:
I thought that I could just integrate Ar^2 twice, which would give me λ.
This is what you should be doing. How exactly did you integrate?
 
I would do this:

∫ A r^2 dr = A ∫ r^2 dr

That would give me this:

(1/3)A r^3

Integrating again treating A as a constant would then give me this:

(1/3)A ∫ r^3 dr = (1/12)A r^4


I could then set λ = (1/12)A r^4 , and I could substitute λ into the equation: e0 E(2π r L) = λ L

E = (A r^3) / (2π*e0*12) I forgot to divide by 2π. But doing that just makes the denominator bigger. :frown:
 
Last edited:
The integration is not correct. Remember this rule? dxdy=r \ dr \ d \theta
 
BruceW said:
The integration is not correct. Remember this rule? dxdy=r \ dr \ d \theta

No. :rolleyes: I don't think I've ever seen that.
 
Last edited:
hmm. I don't think you can do this question without using that rule, so I'm surprised you haven't seen it before. It is essentially an area integral using the cylindrical coordinate system (where the area is perpendicular to the z axis). You could also directly integrate using dxdy, but it would be much more complicated.

Anyway, if you use that rule (remember that r is inside the integral, along with the function), then you should get the right answer for lambda.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K