Solid of revolution knowing only area?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter joeblow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Revolution Solid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the volume of a solid of revolution generated by a region with a complicated boundary, given only the area of that region. Participants explore the relationship between area and volume in the context of solids of revolution, considering various mathematical principles and theorems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that it should be possible to integrate a function dependent solely on the area with respect to θ to find the volume, but notes that this does not yield consistent results across different shapes with the same area.
  • Another participant emphasizes that knowing the area alone is insufficient; the average distance of the area from the rotation axis must also be considered.
  • A question is raised about the role of the centroid of the region in calculating volume, particularly in relation to a small portion of the solid subtending an angle of dθ.
  • It is proposed that calculating the average distance to the rotation axis (barycenter) and the average of the square of that distance may be necessary for accurate volume estimation.
  • Pappus' second centroid theorem is introduced, stating that the volume of a solid of revolution is the product of the area and the distance traveled by the centroid.
  • A participant acknowledges the theorem but notes the absence of a proof, suggesting a layered approach to derive the volume through integration of cylindrical slices.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that additional parameters beyond area are necessary to determine volume, particularly the average distance from the rotation axis. However, the specific methods and implications of these parameters remain a topic of exploration and debate.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of relating area to volume in solids of revolution, with various assumptions about the shapes and their properties being implicit in the arguments presented.

joeblow
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have a region R whose boundary extremely complicated. While it would take me hundreds of years to approximate the boundary with formulae, I can easily estimate the area of R within a desired precision. I want to find the volume of the solid of revolution of R .

My intuition told me that I should be able to integrate some function solely dependent on the area with respect to θ from 0 to 2π .

However, using what knowledge I already have, this is not the case. For instance, the volume of the solid obtained by rotating a right triangle whose base is r and height is h about the axis coninciding with the leg of length h is given by the well-known formula [tex]\frac{1}{3}\pi r^{2}h=\pi r(\frac{1}{2}rh)\cdot\frac{2}{3}=\frac{2A\pi r}{3}[/tex]. The volume of a solid of a similar solid formed by a rectangle of base r and height 1/2 h is given by the well-known fromula [tex]\pi r^{2}(\frac{1}{2}h)=\pi r(\frac{1}{2}rh)=A\pi r[/tex]. The solids are both generated by regions of equal area, yet the volumes are different by a factor of 2/3 .

My question is what parameters are involved in this process? Clearly, I am missing at least one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not sufficient to know the area - you have to know how far away this area is from the rotation axis "on average" (as integral).
 
How would the centroid of the region figure into my volume? I am picturing a small portion of the solid subtending an angle of dθ.
 
That is not enough. If you can calculate the average x (which leads to the barycenter) and the average x^2 (in physics, this would be related to the inertial moment) for your area, this might work. x is the distance to the rotation axis here.
 
Pappus' 2nd centroid theorem

The second theorem states that the volume V of a solid of revolution generated by rotating a plane figure F about an external axis is equal to the product of the area A of F and the distance d traveled by its geometric centroid.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pappus's_centroid_theorem
 
Bingo. Thanks.
 
There's no proof provided in that page, but you can prove it by doing the "natural" process. That is, imagine the solid as a layered cake whose layers are all Δy tall. Take one particular slice subtending an angle of Δθ. Then, you estimate the volume of a slice by adding the volumes of Δθ-slices of cylinders of height Δy and radius x (dependent on y, so it's different at each layer). Taking the limit as Δy→0, you get an integral that you can simplify using the properties of the x-coordinate of the center of mass. Then, just add up all the slices.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K