Solidworks beam deflection and MDSolids

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on discrepancies in beam deflection calculations using Solidworks Simulation compared to hand calculations and MDSolids. The user reports a significant difference of nearly 50% in deflection results, specifically 0.15mm versus 0.30mm. Solidworks employs a non-linear finite element analysis approach that considers the actual geometry of the beam and boundary conditions, which can lead to variations from simpler methods like hand calculations and MDSolids. It is essential to verify results across different software and methodologies to ensure accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam deflection principles and calculations
  • Familiarity with Solidworks Simulation and its capabilities
  • Knowledge of finite element analysis (FEA) concepts
  • Experience with MDSolids for beam analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the fundamentals of non-linear finite element analysis in Solidworks
  • Explore the differences between linear and non-linear analysis in structural engineering
  • Learn about the application of boundary conditions in Solidworks Simulation
  • Read "Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using MATLAB and Abaqus" by Saeed Moaveni for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, structural analysts, and students involved in beam analysis and finite element modeling using Solidworks and MDSolids.

brypie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Sorry if this is in the wrong place...

I've been doing some beam deflections on a simply supported beam, with loads applied to the overhangs, and have used MDSolids, Hand Calculations and Solidworks.

My hand calculations match up with the results that I have got from MDSolids, however they differ significantly (in terms of percentage) when ran in Solidworks Simulation.
The difference is almost 50%, which equates to 0.15mm difference between the two. (I.E smaller deflection is 0.15mm and larger is 0.30) The larger deflection comes from the hand calculations and MDSolids.

I have used macaulys equation to calculate the bem deflection, which I have assumed doesn't actually take into account the geometry of the shape? It only takes into account the second moment of area, which for example, would be same for an 'I' beam or a piece of channel with equivalent dimensions.

Now, my question is this, How does Solidworks calculate deflection? Is it purely based on the second moment of area (which I think is called linear?), or does it also take into account the actual geometry of the beam (I think this is called non-linear?). If it is linear, then could I be getting a different deflection as a result of using fixed geometry for the supports? I have applied the loads in 3d, and ran the analysis in 3d. I have yet to try and treat the beam as a 2D model, as accessing Solidworks is particularly difficult for me at the moment. Or, is it as simple as I need to remodel the beam?

Also, if anyone out there can help me, would you please suggest some further reading material please?

Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for your time! :)</code>Solidworks Simulation uses a non-linear finite element analysis approach to calculate deflections, which takes into account the actual geometry of the beam. The software also takes into account any additional elements such as supports, loads, etc. that are applied to the beam. Depending on the type of load being applied and the boundary conditions, the results can vary significantly from the hand calculations or MDSolids results. It is recommended to double check the results using different software packages or performing manual calculations.For further reading material, I would recommend looking at resources such as "Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using MATLAB and Abaqus" by Saeed Moaveni or "Finite Element Analysis: Theory and Application with ANSYS" by Saeed Moaveni. These books provide an in-depth look at the fundamentals of finite element analysis and how to use different software packages to perform the analysis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K