Soln of Leplace in Cartesian Coord

  • Thread starter Thread starter Apteronotus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the Laplace equation in Cartesian coordinates and the confusion surrounding the coefficients in the general solution. The user is attempting to derive the electric potential for a uniform field affected by a dielectric cube, but struggles with the boundary conditions necessary to determine the coefficients A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2. It is emphasized that these coefficients are typically resolved by applying specific boundary conditions related to the problem's geometry. The user seeks guidance on how to approach the problem effectively. Understanding the boundary conditions is crucial for simplifying the solution and accurately calculating the electric potential.
Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm getting confused solving the Laplace eqn in Cartesian coordinates.

The equation can be solved by solving each of
<br /> \frac{X&#039;&#039;(x)}{X(x)}=-k_x^2, \qquad\qquad<br /> \frac{Y&#039;&#039;(y)}{Y(y)}=-k_y^2, \qquad\qquad<br /> \frac{Z&#039;&#039;(z)}{Z(z)}=k_z^2<br />

and then substituting into the equation
<br /> \Phi(\vec{x})=X(x)Y(y)Z(z)<br />

The solution to the (general) ODE's is
<br /> X(x)=A_1e^{ik_xx}+A_2e^{-ik_xx}, \qquad\qquad<br /> Y(y)=B_1e^{ik_yy}+B_2e^{-ik_yy}, \qquad\qquad<br /> Z(z)=C_1e^{k_zz}+C_2e^{k_zz}<br />

But the solution when solving for the electric potential is given by
<br /> \Phi_{k_x,k_y,\pm}(\vec{x})=exp\left(ik_xx+ik_yy \pm\sqrt{k_x^2+k_y^2}\right)<br />

Where am I going wrong?
Why have they let the coefficients A_{1,2}, B_{1,2}, C_{1,2}=1?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The values for the coefficients in the general solution can be found by applying the boundary conditions of the problem. Nobody can answer your question without more information about what the boundary conditions were. (You need to give us the whole problem.) Depending on the geometry of the problem, certain conditions will force certain coefficients to have particular values, which will usually simplify your solution to something with a manageable form. You will normally end up doing something like Fourier's trick to determine the value of the coefficient determined by the last boundary condition, and you will end up with an expression for the potential. Sometimes, things will simplify really nicely.
 
Last edited:
So then is the general solution always

<br /> \Phi(\vec{x})=\left[A_1e^{ik_xx}+A_2e^{ik_xx}\right]\cdot\left[B_1e^{ik_yy}+B_2e^{ik_yy}\right]\cdot\left[C_1e^{k_zz}+C_2e^{-k_zz}\right]<br />

and depending on the boundary condition we solve for the A_{1,2}, B_{1,2}, C_{1,2}, k_1 \quad\mbox{and}\quad k_2?

The problem I have is solving the electric potential of a uniform field, when a dielectric cube is placed within it. I can assume that the field lines are parallel to two of the cube's sides.

If you know how I can approach this problem, I would be grateful if you could guide me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K