Solution for differential equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a differential equation related to a particle's trajectory in a bounded spherical potential defined by the potential function V(r). The potential is V0 for |r| ≤ a and 0 otherwise, with the condition that the particle's energy E is less than V0. Participants agree that if E < V0, the particle cannot penetrate the potential and will reflect off the boundary. The derived differential equation m \ddot{r} = V0 [δ(r - a) - δ(r + a)] r/r describes the forces acting on the particle at the boundaries, and the conversation suggests using energy conservation equations and considering the boundary conditions to analyze the problem further.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics and potential energy concepts
  • Familiarity with differential equations in physics
  • Knowledge of central force problems and angular momentum conservation
  • Basic principles of scattering theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of energy conservation in central force problems
  • Learn about scattering theory and its applications to potential barriers
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for solving differential equations in physics
  • Investigate the behavior of particles at potential boundaries and the concept of limiting cases
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students studying classical mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of particle dynamics in potential fields.

PhysicsRock
Messages
121
Reaction score
19
Greetings,
in one of the exercise sheets we were given by our Prof, we were supposed to draw the trajectory of a patricle that moves toward a bounded spherical potential that satisfies

##
V(\vec{r}) = \begin{cases}
V_0 & | \vec{r} | \leq a \\
0 & else \\
\end{cases}
##

for ##E_\text{particle} < V_0##. I drew a circular path within the potential boundary, but apparently that is wrong. A friend of mine brought to my attention that the particle couldn't enter the potential at all, if it's Energy is lower than the potential energy. I wanted to take a look at this analytically and derived the differential equation

##
m \ddot{\vec{r}} = V_0 \left[ \delta(r - a) - \delta(r + a) \right] \frac{\vec{r}}{r}
##

with ##r = | \vec{r} |##. Intuitively, it makes sense to me as there is no Force on the particle unless it's right at the boundaries where the potential changes, thus satisfying ##\vec{F} = - \nabla V##.

To come to my question, has anyone got any idea how this could be solved, if it is even possible to solve an equation of that form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have written a three-dimensional equation for what is essentially a one-dimensional problem because the potential depends on ##r## only. For that reason, I think it is safe to assume that angular momentum is conserved, write the standard energy conservation equations, one for each region, used in central force problems and see where it takes you. You will have to figure out how to quantify the "kick" that the particle receives at the boundary. I have not solved this problem, but that would be my approach.

Your friend is correct. If the particle has energy less than ##V_0##, it will not penetrate (classically) the potential, i.e. it will bounce off with no energy loss. This sounds like scattering off a hard sphere to me.
 
The trajectory is straightforward everywhere except at the boundary.
Focusing in on the boundary, you can treat it as a flat surface.
The sudden jump in potential should be thought of as a limiting case. E.g., start with a simple linear rise over some short distance, solve, then take the limit as the distance tends to zero.
The awkward question is whether all nonlinear models produce the same limiting solution. If not, the question is not well posed.

Fwiw, it smells to me like a light ray striking a boundary where the refractive index drops .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K