How Does the Delta Function Simplify Integral Equations in Arken's Text?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hariraumurthy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Hariraumurthy
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am trying to read arken's section on integral equations because I need it for a problem I am trying to attack. I am stuck on a part of a page. I have attached the relevant excerpt from the book.(Not the whole book because it is copyrighted)


Homework Equations



I am stuck on equation 16.9. That is I am not sure how for the special case of [tex]v\left( {\vec r,\vec r'} \right) = v\left( {\vec r} \right)\delta \left( {\vec r - \vec r'} \right)[/tex], that
[tex]\left( {{\nabla ^2} + {a^2}} \right)\psi \left( {\vec r} \right) = \int {v\left( {\vec r,\vec r'} \right)} \psi \left( {\vec r} \right){d^3}\left( {r'} \right)[/tex] reduces to [tex]\left( {{\nabla ^2} + {a^2}} \right)\psi \left( {\vec r} \right) = v\left( {\vec r} \right)\psi \left( {\vec r} \right)[/tex]
when

The Attempt at a Solution


If [tex]{\vec r}[/tex] is in the region of integration [tex]\Omega[/tex] (case 1), then using integration by parts, the reduced RHS is given by [tex]\int\limits_\Omega ^{} {v\left( {\vec r'} \right)\psi \left( {\vec r'} \right)} \delta \left( {\vec r - \vec r'} \right){d^3}\left( {r'} \right) = {\left[ {v\left( {r'} \right)v(r')} \right]_\Omega } - \int_\Omega ^{} d \left( {v\left( {\vec r'} \right)\psi \left( {\vec r'} \right)} \right)[/tex] since in general the integral of [tex]\delta \left( {\vec x} \right)[/tex] over any region containing [tex]\vec x = 0[/tex] is 1. The second integral [tex]\int_\Omega ^{} d \left( {v\left( {\vec r'} \right)\psi \left( {\vec r'} \right)} \right)[/tex] is just [tex]{\left[ {v\left( {r'} \right)v(r')} \right]_\Omega }[/tex]. Therefore the RHS is 0 which is not the LHS.

Case 2: [tex]\vec r \notin \Omega[/tex]. Doing the same integration by parts, the reduced RHS is
[tex]{\left[ {v\left( {r'} \right)v(r')} \right]_\Omega }\int_\Omega ^{} {\delta \left( {\vec r - \vec r'} \right)} {d^3}\left( {r'} \right) - \int_\Omega ^{} {\left( {\left( {\int_\Omega ^{} {\delta \left( {\vec r - \vec r'} \right){d^3}\left( {r'} \right)} } \right)d\left( {v\left( {\vec r'} \right)\psi \left( {\vec r'} \right)} \right)} \right)} = 0 - 0 \ne RHS[/tex].

In summary I am having trouble verifying that for the special case of 16.9, 16.8 reduces to 16.6.

Also is [tex]\partial \Omega[/tex] fixed or not?(my guess is that the boundary is fixed because Arken transforms this into a fredholm equation of the second kind later on in the page(included in the excerpt.)

Thanks in advance for replying.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

You simply have to consider that

[itex]\int_{\Omega}\mathrm{d}x f(x) \delta(x) = f(0) \; \mathrm{if} \; 0\in \Omega, \mathrm{or} =0 \; \mathrm{if} \; 0\notin\Omega[/itex];

no integration by parts is needed :)

Ilm