Solution of System of Equations: [Lambda] = 3/(2x)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
14 replies · 3K views
snoggerT
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
[lambda]=3/(2x) = 1/(2y) = 1/(3z) with constraint eq. x^2+2y^2+6z^2=1





The Attempt at a Solution



- I can't figure out how to solve this system of equations. Can somebody please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is [tex]\lambda[/tex] supposed to be constant? If so, then it appears simple. Just Express x,y,z in terms of lambda, substitute it into the constraint equation and solve for lambda.
 
Defennder said:
Is [tex]\lambda[/tex] supposed to be constant? If so, then it appears simple. Just Express x,y,z in terms of lambda, substitute it into the constraint equation and solve for lambda.

- yeah, that's way simpler than I was making it. So I would take lambda and plug back into find my x, y, z, right?
 
Defennder said:
Yes that's right.

- so I get lambda to be +/- sqrt(41/12), which can be reduced to +/- 1/2*sqrt(41/3), but that gets somewhat ugly when plugging back into find my x,y,z. I'm trying to find the min/max on this problem, so I have to find my x,y,z to plug back into the f(x,y,z) function. Is there any way to simplify things further?
 
Wait wait! You're solving for lambda?

[tex]\lambda=\frac{3}{2x}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{2y}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{3z}[/tex]

Set them equal to each other so that you have y = ... in terms of x and z = ... in terms of x so you can plug it back into your equation to solve for x.
 
Last edited:
rocomath said:
Wait wait! You're solving for lambda?

[tex]\lambda=\frac{3}{2x}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{2y}[/tex]

[tex]\lambda=\frac{1}{3z}[/tex]

Set them equal to each other so that you have y = ... in terms of x and z = ... in terms of x so you can plug it back into your equation to solve for x.

- so I get +/- sqrt(27/41) for x, is that right?
 
snoggerT said:
- so I get +/- sqrt(27/41) for x, is that right?
Hmm, what did you do?
 
rocomath said:
Hmm, what did you do?

- I set 3/(2x)= 1/(2y) and got y in terms of x and did the same for z. then plugged into the constraint equation and solved for x. I'm guessing I did it wrong though.
 
[tex]y=\frac x 3[/tex]

[tex]z=\frac 2 9 x[/tex]
 
rocomath said:
[tex]y=\frac x 3[/tex]

[tex]z=\frac 2 9 x[/tex]

- that's what I got for y and z, so I must of done something wrong with my algebra in the constraint equation. Let me work it again.
 
I still get x=+/- sqrt(27/41). So I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. This is how I'm setting the problem up:

x^2+2(x/3)^2+6(2x/9)^2=1
 
This is a lagrange multiplier problem isn't it? Can you state the original problem?
 
Dick said:
This is a lagrange multiplier problem isn't it? Can you state the original problem?

- sure. I probably need to start over anyways because I think I'm just confusing myself.

find the min/max:

f(x,y,z)=3x+2y+4z with constraint equation x^2+2y^2+6z^2=1
 
Ok, I think you are on completely the right track. lambda^2=12/41 is what I get too. And yes, x=+/-sqrt(27/41). I'll admit the numbers aren't that pretty. But I think you are doing exactly the right thing. Just keep on doing it.
 
Last edited: