Solution to Laplace Equation across Boundaries

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of solutions to Laplace's Equation, particularly regarding their behavior at shared boundaries between different regions. Participants explore whether solutions must agree on these boundaries and the implications of continuity and differentiability in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the requirement for solutions to Laplace's Equation to coincide at shared boundaries, with some providing examples to illustrate differing functions in adjacent regions. Others discuss the implications of continuity and differentiability in relation to physical scenarios.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various perspectives being explored. Some participants assert that there is no requirement for solutions to agree at boundaries, while others provide specific examples and contexts where continuity may be necessary. The conversation reflects a range of interpretations without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical conditions and physical scenarios, such as electromagnetism, where the behavior of potentials at boundaries may vary. There is an ongoing examination of assumptions related to continuity and differentiability in the context of Laplace's Equation.

Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I read somewhere that solutions to Laplace's Equation must agree at a shared boundary.
So for example if [tex]\Phi_{1}[/tex] and [tex]\Phi_{2}[/tex] are two solutions to the Laplace equation in two different regions which share a boundary, then on the boundary [tex]\Phi_{1}[/tex] = [tex]\Phi_{2}[/tex]
Is this true?
Can you help me see why?

Thanks in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Apteronotus said:
Hi everyone,

I read somewhere that solutions to Laplace's Equation must agree at a shared boundary.
So for example if [tex]\Phi_{1}[/tex] and [tex]\Phi_{2}[/tex] are two solutions to the Laplace equation in two different regions which share a boundary, then on the boundary [tex]\Phi_{1}[/tex] = [tex]\Phi_{2}[/tex]
Is this true?
Can you help me see why?

Thanks in advance,
In order that a function satisfy Laplace's equation, it must be differentiable. Otherewise the derivatives don't make sense! In particular, that means it must be continuous.
 
Though I don't disagree with your statement HallsofIvy, it wouldn't necessarily apply in this situation. One function [tex]\Phi_{1}[tex]is continuous in region 1 and the other [tex]\Phi_{2}[tex]is continuous in region 2, where region 1 and 2 only share a boundary. <br /> <br /> Would it be true that these two <b>different</b> functions have the same value on this boundary, given that they both satisfy the Laplace equation?[/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex]
 
Apteronotus said:
Hi everyone,
I read somewhere that solutions to Laplace's Equation must agree at a shared boundary. then on the boundary [tex]\Phi_{1} = \Phi_{2}[/tex].

If this true? Let f : S1->R = 37. Let g: S2->R = 92. Both f and g satisfy Laplace's equation on S1 and S2 respectively. Suppose S1 = {(x,y) | x^2 + y^2 <= 2}, and S2={(x,y) | 1< x^2 + y^2 <= 2}.
S1 and S2 share a boundary, namely x^2 + y^2 = 2, but f and g are different functions on this boundary.
 
No, there is NO requirement that solutions of Laplace's equations in different regions (with shared boundary) coincide on the boundary. Rather, Laplace's equation itself makes no requirement. Within a region, a solution must be differentiable, but at the boundaries, it is usually not, and can even be discontinuous.

The question as to whether two adjoining solutions must be "stitched together" in a continuous way depends entirely on the physical problem at hand. In electromagnetism, for example, the electric potential must be continuous in most cases; therefore, we must choose Laplace solutions that match up on the boundaries. Even so, the potential will usually NOT be differentiable at the boundaries (consider the potential of a conducting shell, which is constant inside, but falls as 1/r outside).

There are some cases, however, in which the potential is also discontinuous: e.g., a dipole layer. A dipole layer is a surface which is considered to have a certain dipole moment per unit area (perpendicular to the surface). Across a dipole layer, the potential makes a discontinuous jump in proportion to the local dipole moment.
 
Thank you kindly for your replies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K