monty37
- 225
- 1
why is the 4th order Runge -Kutta method widely used than the 2nd or 3rd,for
solving ordinary differential equations?
solving ordinary differential equations?
The discussion revolves around the choice of the 4th order Runge-Kutta method for solving ordinary differential equations compared to lower-order methods. It explores aspects of accuracy, computational cost, and the prevalence of different methods in literature.
Participants generally agree on the accuracy advantages of the 4th order method over lower orders, but there is uncertainty regarding the prevalence and utility of the 3rd order method, indicating a lack of consensus on its significance in literature.
Limitations include the dependence on computational resources and the potential impact of finite arithmetic on the accuracy of results, which remains unresolved.
arildno said:Cost-effectiveness.
Although 2. and 3.order Runge-Kutta are quicker than 4th order, they are much less exact.
For orders higher than 4, those take too long time to compute.
On another note:
Although I won't vouch for at which order this will become significant, the upper limit of an approximate scheme in terms of exactness will be when the finite arithmetic of the computer starts messing with the answers we want.
matematikawan said:I agree with you. Just that I never see RK3 formula in the literatures. Why is that so?