Solution to the Klein Gordon Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Klein Gordon equation's general solution is expressed as ψ(r,t) = e^(i(kr - ωt)), adhering to the constraint -k² + ω²/c² = m²c²/ħ². This solution can be derived using Euler's formula, resulting in the expression cos(kr - ωt) + i sin(kr - ωt). The probability density is calculated as ψ*ψ, not ψ², which resolves the confusion regarding the integration of the square over an interval.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Klein Gordon equation
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and Euler's formula
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics probability density
  • Basic calculus for integration concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Klein Gordon equation in quantum field theory
  • Learn about probability densities in quantum mechanics
  • Explore Euler's formula and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the implications of complex wave functions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical physics concepts.

benk99nenm312
Messages
302
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I was reading up on the Klein Gordon equation and I came across an article that gave a general solution as: \psi(r,t)= e^i(kr-\omegat), under the constraint that -k^2 + \omega^2/c^2 = m^2c^2/\hbar^2, forgive my lack of latex hah.

Through Euler's law this does give a solution tantamount to cos(kr-\omegat)+isin(kr-\omegat).

My question is simply.. is this valid? I ask because if you were to integrate the square over an interval you should get a probability, however the imaginary term will carry through from the de Moivre formula. I'm terribly confused.

Thanks guys!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hey benk99nenm312! :smile:
benk99nenm312 said:
… if you were to integrate the square over an interval you should get a probability, however the imaginary term will carry through from the de Moivre formula. I'm terribly confused.

no, the probability is ψ*ψ, not ψ2 :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
hey benk99nenm312! :smile:


no, the probability is ψ*ψ, not ψ2 :wink:

Omg wowww, lol. Thank you hah.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
665
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K