Xuser
- 4
- 0
Hello math goers,
My education in linear algebra is limited to an Intro course I took a year ago. So I am posting this to see if such a solution exists in the first place, at least so I can start learning about it.
The problem is: solve A for equation
[tex]u(t) = A \cdot v(t+t_o)[/tex]
[tex]\left[ \begin{array}{c} u(t_1)\\ u(t_2)\\ \vdots\\ u(t_n) \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} a_1 & a_2 & \cdots & a_n \end{array} \right] \cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} v(t_1+t_o) \\ v(t_2+t_o) \\ \vdots \\ v(t_n+t_o) \end{array} \right][/tex]
Where [tex]t_o[/tex] is some known offset with respect to [tex]t[/tex] .
Essentially what these represent are two data signals [tex]v(t_v)[/tex] and [tex]u(t_u)[/tex], these two signals have some small time offset that I can calculate using a reference peak that both signals contain. However, getting A is not as simple as solving for A because the data is not continuous.
The "easy" way around this is to manually align every single value [tex]v(t_v)[/tex] with [tex]u(t_u)[/tex], but this is computationally expensive.
Any thoughts?
My education in linear algebra is limited to an Intro course I took a year ago. So I am posting this to see if such a solution exists in the first place, at least so I can start learning about it.
The problem is: solve A for equation
[tex]u(t) = A \cdot v(t+t_o)[/tex]
[tex]\left[ \begin{array}{c} u(t_1)\\ u(t_2)\\ \vdots\\ u(t_n) \end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{cccc} a_1 & a_2 & \cdots & a_n \end{array} \right] \cdot \left[ \begin{array}{c} v(t_1+t_o) \\ v(t_2+t_o) \\ \vdots \\ v(t_n+t_o) \end{array} \right][/tex]
Where [tex]t_o[/tex] is some known offset with respect to [tex]t[/tex] .
Essentially what these represent are two data signals [tex]v(t_v)[/tex] and [tex]u(t_u)[/tex], these two signals have some small time offset that I can calculate using a reference peak that both signals contain. However, getting A is not as simple as solving for A because the data is not continuous.
The "easy" way around this is to manually align every single value [tex]v(t_v)[/tex] with [tex]u(t_u)[/tex], but this is computationally expensive.
Any thoughts?
Last edited: