Solution to vector equation involving vector product

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the vector equation ## x + (x \times a) = b ##, exploring methods for finding the vector X. Participants examine the implications of the equation, potential solutions, and the use of different vector bases for simplification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about how to derive the solution for the vector equation and question the possibility of factoring out x from the left-hand side.
  • One participant suggests that the focus should be on determining whether the equation has one or more solutions rather than solving it outright.
  • Another participant explains that expanding the vector equation leads to three linear equations in three unknowns, indicating that factoring out x is not feasible.
  • A proposed method involves expressing x as a linear combination of the vectors a, b, and a × b, with scalars m, n, and p, and substituting these into the original equation.
  • Some participants argue that there is no natural multiplication of vectors in ## \mathbb R^3 ## that allows for factoring, aside from dot and cross products.
  • There is a discussion about the orthogonality of vectors and how it affects the application of certain methods for solving the equation.
  • Participants discuss the relevance of using a basis of a, b, and a × b versus the standard basis i, j, k, noting that it simplifies computations in this context.
  • One participant mentions the importance of the scalar triple product in the context of the vector components and their relationships.
  • Several participants share their attempts at finding the components x1, x2, and x3, and seek further simplification and clarification on their methods.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for solving the equation, and multiple competing views remain regarding the approach to take and the feasibility of factoring out x.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions highlight limitations in understanding the vector triple product and the implications of the vectors being non-coplanar. There are unresolved assumptions about the relationships between the vectors involved and their properties.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in vector mathematics, particularly those exploring vector equations and their solutions in three-dimensional space, may find this discussion relevant.

PcumP_Ravenclaw
Messages
105
Reaction score
4
I want to find the solution of vector X. I am using text from Alan F. Beardon Algebra and Geometry as attached. I don't know how the solution is derived for the following equation.

## x + (x × a) = b ##

The second solution when ## a \times b \neq 0 ## then X cannot be b. Is it possible to factorize x out from the Left-hand-side of the above equation?
 

Attachments

  • Vector_Equations.jpg
    Vector_Equations.jpg
    23.4 KB · Views: 592
Physics news on Phys.org
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:
I want to find the solution of vector X. I am using text from Alan F. Beardon Algebra and Geometry as attached. I don't know how the solution is derived for the following equation.

## x + (x × a) = b ##

The second solution when ## a \times b \neq 0 ## then X cannot be b. Is it possible to factorize x out from the Left-hand-side of the above equation?
It seems to me that you're missing the point, which is not to solve the equation, but only to determine whether it has one or more solutions.

The assumption is that you have two solutions -- let's call them x1 and x2. How they were obtained is not important. In the page whose image you included, they assume that y is the difference of any two solutions, so y = x1 - x2. Continue from here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PcumP_Ravenclaw
When you expand the vector equation as 3 scalars in terms of the components of x, you will have 3 linear equations in 3 unknowns. There is no way to factor out x.
 
For solving vector equations like the one you got, there is a method. Since a,b and axb are 3 non-coplanar vectors, you can take
##x=ma+nb+p(a*b)##
Just like you take x=ai+bj+ck.
Where m,n,p are scalars.

Try finding the values of m,n,p by substituting the value of x in the given vector equation.

I am sorry @Mark44 for providing the solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PcumP_Ravenclaw
There is no natural multiplication of vectors in ## \mathbb R^3 ## that allows you to factor.
EDIT I meant other than the obvious dot and cross products; then some expressions containing
both may be at times factorable, but not otherwise.
 
Hey @AdityaDev, A & B are not necessarily orthogonal so it is not exactly like ai + bj + ck where i, j & k are mutually orthogonal! so??
 
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:
Hey @AdityaDev, A & B are not necessarily orthogonal so it is not exactly like ai + bj + ck where i, j & k are mutually orthogonal! so??
It doesn't matter. I have solved many questions using this method.
In certain questions, you have to use logic.
Example: Solve $$ \vec{r}\times\vec{b}=\vec{a}\times\vec{b}$$
Given r.c=0
 
Aditya's missing explanations in the above post can be found in this attachment!

Why do we want to find the vector X with basis ## a, b, a \times b ## ?

Why not in simple ##i, j, k##? Is it because it is simplest and cancels out easily in the equation ##x + (x \times a) = b##

Then why is each component ## x_1 , x_2 , x_3 ## not divided by the scalar triple product ## [a, b, a \times b] ## e.g.

## X = [X, b, a \times b]/[a, b, a \times b]*x_1 + [a, X, a \times b]/[a, b, a \times b]*x_2 + [a, b,X]/[a, b, a \times b]*x_3 ##
 

Attachments

  • Vector_Equations2.jpg
    Vector_Equations2.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 527
Last edited:
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:
Aditya's missing explanations in the above post can be found in this attachment!
It was a question for you to practice. I already knew the solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PcumP_Ravenclaw
  • #10
I have attached my attempt at finding ##x_1 , x_2, x_3##. How do I simplify further??
 

Attachments

  • Vector_Equations3.jpg
    Vector_Equations3.jpg
    37.1 KB · Views: 553
  • #11
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:
I have attached my attempt at finding ##x_1 , x_2, x_3##. How do I simplify further??
What you have done is correct.
Capture.PNG


Now, expand (axb)xa.
(axb)xa=(a.a)b-(a.b)a ---> Vector triple product.
Now you will get :

Capture2.PNG

Then expand the last term to get ##X_3|a|^2\vec{b}-X_3(a.b)\vec{a}##
Now you will get this expression :
Capture3.PNG

then group axb and bxa terms as you can express axb as -bxa.
then group the terms with vector a.
also group the terms of vector b.
So you have three terms.
Then equate the coefficients of all vectors other than b like a and axb to find x1,x2,x3.
 
  • #12
Hey @AdityaDev, thanks for your help. I was not that familiar with vector triple product so I could not spot the expansion of ##a \times b \times a ## into (a.a)b - (a.b)a.
 
  • #13
EDIT: equate the coefficients of all vectors other than b "to zero". Now you can find x1, x2, x3.
Did you get the correct answer?
 
  • #14
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:
I want to find the solution of vector X. I am using text from Alan F. Beardon Algebra and Geometry as attached. I don't know how the solution is derived for the following equation.

## x + (x × a) = b ##

The second solution when ## a \times b \neq 0 ## then X cannot be b. Is it possible to factorize x out from the Left-hand-side of the above equation?
PcumP_Ravenclaw said:
I want to find the solution of vector X. I am using text from Alan F. Beardon Algebra and Geometry as attached. I don't know how the solution is derived for the following equation.

## x + (x × a) = b ##

The second solution when ## a \times b \neq 0 ## then X cannot be b. Is it possible to factorize x out from the Left-hand-side of the above equation?
First take the cross product with a on both sides,
This should give you , (b-x) + (a.x)a - (|a|^2)x = b×a...(equation 1)here I have substituted x × a as b-x,
Substitute value of a.x by using a second equation , in which you take dot product on both sides of the original equation , x.a + (x×a).a= b.a
Which gives x.a + 0 = b.a
Now substitute a.x as b.a

This should allow you to collect terms of x.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Ananya0107 said:
First take the cross product with a on both sides,
This should give you , (b-x) + (a.x)a - (|a|^2)x = b×a
Substitute value of a.x by using a second equation , in which you take dot product on both sides of the original equation , such tha
a.x + 0 = b.a
This should allow you to collect terms of x.
You will get (a.x)a=(b-x)×a + kx
also, you can't find a.x from this equation because it is grouped with a vector and if you thought this: $$a.x=\frac{(b-x)\times\vec{a}+kx}{\vec{a}}$$
Then you are wrong.
You can however find the value of vector a.
 
  • #16
Please see the edited post above .
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: AdityaDev
  • #17
Hi, can you all answer my questions??

Why do we want to find the vector X with basis ##a, b, a \times b## ?

Why not in simple ##i,j,k##? Is it because it is simplest and cancels out easily in the equation## x+(x×a)=bx + (x \times a) = b##

Then why is each component ## x_1 , x_2 , x_3## not divided by the scalar triple product ##[a, b, a \times b]## e.g.

## X=[X,b,a \times b]/[a,b,a \times b]∗x_1+[a,X,a \times b]/[a,b,a \times b]∗x_2+[a,b,X]/[a,b,a \times b]∗x_3 ##

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
  • #18
a, b, and a×b are a set of non coplanar vectors and any vector in three dimensional space can be expressed as a linear combination of three non-coplanar vectors,( just like i, j, k)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PcumP_Ravenclaw
  • #19
Hey @Ananya0107, Can you explain why was a, b and a x b selected why not any other vector as you say " any vector in three dimensional space can be expressed as a linear combination of three non-coplanar vectors,( just like i, j, k)"?

Thanks!
 
  • #20
The question contained the vectors a and b so it is easier to express the required vector x in terms of a , b and a×b , it is just easier for computation .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K