(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); solutions to the TISE for "unbound states"

Hi!

Suppose we have a step potential with boundary at x=0

V=0 for x<0 and V=V for x>0

Suppose V>E

I guess I hot pretty far with this problem, I do have one doubt however:

We obviously have two solutions:

[tex]

\psi _{I} (x)=Ae ^{ik _{1}x }+ Be ^{-ik _{1}x }

[/tex]

and

[tex]

\psi _{II} (x)=De ^{-k _{2}x }

[/tex]

Now these are the eigenfunctions, to get the wavefunctions I balieve that we need to:

[tex]

\psi(x,t)=\psi(x)e ^{(-iEt2 \pi)/h}

[/tex]

But is it true for both [tex] \psi _{I} [/tex] and [tex] \psi _{II} [/tex]?

I saw somewhere that the wavefunctions for this particular case are given by

[tex]

\psi _{I} (x,t)=\psi _{I} (x)e ^{(-iEt2 \pi)/h}

[/tex]

and

[tex]

\psi _{II} (x,t)=\psi _{I} (x)e ^{(-iEt2 \pi)/h}

[/tex]

This is really confusing, I guess it should have been

[tex]

\psi _{II} (x,t)=\psi _{II} (x)e ^{(-iEt2 \pi)/h}

[/tex]

But why Is the second sunction a wavefunction anyway.

It is just a decaying exponential , not a wavelike function?

Or is it that if we multiply it by that

[tex]

e ^{(-iEt2 \pi)/h}

[/tex]

this somehow changes it into a wave?

Please explain.

Also I was wondering if you could think of any physical real life situation to which this idealized problem might correspond?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Solutions to the TISE for unbound states

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**