Solve 3D TISE in Potential Well: Eigenvals/Fns & Normalize

  • Thread starter Thread starter obnoxiousris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE) for a particle in a 3D cubical potential well defined by dimensions Lx, Ly, and Lz. The potential V(x,y,z) is zero within the well and infinite outside. The solution involves finding separable wavefunctions in the form ψ(x,y,z) = X(x)Y(y)Z(z) and normalizing them. The participant expresses confusion over using trigonometric versus complex exponential solutions and emphasizes the necessity of satisfying boundary conditions to achieve valid eigenfunctions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Time-Independent Schrödinger Equation (TISE)
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with wavefunction normalization techniques
  • Concept of separable solutions in multi-dimensional systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for 3D potential wells
  • Learn about boundary condition applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore normalization methods for wavefunctions in quantum systems
  • Investigate the differences between trigonometric and complex exponential solutions in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on solving the Schrödinger Equation in multi-dimensional potential wells.

obnoxiousris
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle in a 3D cubical potential well. The walls are Lx, Ly, Lz long.
Inside the well, V(x,y,z)=0 when 0<x<Lx, 0<y<Ly, 0<z<Lz. V= ∞ elsewhere.
Solve the TISE to find the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of this potential. And to normalise the wavefunctions.

(Hint: look for separable solutions in the form ψ(x,y,z)=X(x)Y(y)Z(z))

Homework Equations



(-hbar/2m)(∇2)ψ(x,y,z)+V(x,y,z)ψ(x,y,z)=Eψ(x,y,z)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm confused about which equation to use for this question. I know that for a potential well, the V terms are zero, and i can write -hbar/2m and E in terms of k, so the equation reduces to ∇2ψ(x,y,z)=-k2ψ(x,y,z).

we did the one dimensional well in class. my teacher used ψ(x)=Asin(kx)+Bsin(kx) as a general solution, then subbed in the boundary conditions like when x=L, ψ(x)=0 and so on.

However, I know that ψ(x)=Aeikx is also a general solution to the differential equation. And this is used for free particles. I did some research online, and apparently I can treat a particle in the well as a free particle.

So i don't know which equation i should use, and what are the differences between the two equations? Some sites I've seen used the trig, some used the complex.

I tried to use the complex one, I got (after normalisation) ψ(x,y,z)=(1/sqrt3L)ei(kxx+kyy+kzz). Then I tried to sub in the boundary conditions, only to realize no matter what i did i couldn't make ψ=0.
So I tried to use the trig, but the equation wasn't separable.

I really don't know what to do here, some help would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two independent solutions, eikx and e-ikx. You will need both in order to satisfy your boundary conditions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K