Solve a+b+c=0 given a+(1/b)=b+(1/c)=c+(1/a)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Perpendicular
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that given the equation a + (1/b) = b + (1/c) = c + (1/a), either a = b = c or a + b + c = 0. Participants explore algebraic manipulations and substitutions, noting that assuming a = b leads to consistent results. They highlight that the symmetry of the equations suggests a symmetric proof is necessary. Attempts to derive a + b + c = 0 from the initial conditions are met with challenges, indicating that further exploration of the relationships between a, b, and c is needed. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of the problem and the need for careful algebraic handling.
Perpendicular
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Given : a + (1/b) = b + (1/c) = c + (1/a)

prove a=b=c or a+b+c = 0

I know that a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = 3abc is sufficient proof to derive the above two relations asked for..but I cannot get the expression up to there.

I tried to see if a+b+c = 0 logically leads to the given equation, but no luck so far.

What am I missing ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume that the equation is true, and assume that first a solution is a=b=c try replacing a with b:
b+1/b = b+1/c=c+1/b
And c should also be equal to b. So replace again:
c+1/c = c+1/c = c+1/c
True true true. So indeed that is a solution. Do the same for a+b+c=0 <=> a = -b-c
and find that the equation is true
 
Perpendicular said:
Given : a + (1/b) = b + (1/c) = c + (1/a)

prove a=b=c or a+b+c = 0

I know that a^3 + b^3 + c^3 = 3abc is sufficient proof to derive the above two relations asked for..but I cannot get the expression up to there.

I tried to see if a+b+c = 0 logically leads to the given equation, but no luck so far.

What am I missing ?
You have two independent equations:
a + (1/b) = b + (1/c)​
and
a + (1/b) = c + (1/a)
Solve the second one for c, and plug that into the first one.

Do some algebraic manipulation. One solution should be a = b .

The other solution is more complicated. I assume it should lead to a+b+c=0
 
hmm … the solution is symmetric, so i'd expect the proof to be symmetric also :redface:

if we subtract the three equations in pairs, i can get to abc = ±1, or a = b = c :smile:

and it might help to use that if p/q = r/s = t/u, then they all equal [Ap+Br+Ct]/[Aq+Bs+Cu]
 
Putting a+b+c = 0 the equation is not becoming an identity...
 
Perpendicular said:
Putting a+b+c = 0 the equation is not becoming an identity...
What else have you tried?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K