Solve A: Evaluating L'Hospital's Rule for k→0

  • Thread starter Thread starter glid02
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the limit of the equation A = 44*e^(kt/5) + 49((1-e^(kt/5))/k) as k approaches 0 using L'Hôpital's Rule. The correct application of L'Hôpital's Rule reveals that the limit of the second part of the equation simplifies to -49/5*t. The final result for the entire expression as k approaches 0 is 44 - 49/5*t. The user initially misapplied L'Hôpital's Rule, leading to incorrect conclusions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with L'Hôpital's Rule
  • Basic knowledge of exponential functions
  • Ability to differentiate functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of L'Hôpital's Rule in calculus
  • Study the properties of exponential functions and their limits
  • Practice solving limits involving indeterminate forms
  • Explore advanced calculus topics related to series expansions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and L'Hôpital's Rule, as well as educators looking for examples of limit evaluations involving exponential functions.

glid02
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I have the equation A
44*e^(kt/5)+49((1-e^(kt/5))/k)

and I'm supposed to evaluate as k-->0

I think I'm supposed to apply l'hospital's rule to the second part of the equation, which would give
49*((1-t/5*e^(kt/5))/1)
which as k-->0 is
49*(1-t/5)

so the whole thing as k-->0 is
44+49*(1-t/5)

This isn't right, and I also tried l'hosital's rule on the first part of A, which would give 44*t/5 and this isn't right either.

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks.

Here's the whole question, in case I'm not reading it right:
Find the limit of this velocity for a fixed time t_0 as the air resistance coefficient k goes to 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have, by L'Hopital's rule:
[tex]\lim_{k\to{0}}49\frac{1-e^{\frac{kt}{5}}}{k}=\lim_{k\to{0}}49\frac{-\frac{t}{5}e^{\frac{kt}{5}}}{1}=-\frac{49}{5}t[/tex]
 
Oh yeah, that 1 should've disappeared from what I found.

Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K