Solve Balmer's Formula for Wavelengths

  • Thread starter Thread starter elephantorz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving for wavelengths using Balmer's formula, specifically the equation λ = 94.18 nm / (1/m² - 1/n²), where m and n are integers representing quantum states. Participants explore the series of wavelengths provided, including 12500 nm and 375 nm, and discuss the mathematical approach to derive a formula from these series. Key insights include the importance of identifying patterns through successive differences and the suggestion to consider both wavelengths and frequencies for a comprehensive analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Balmer's formula and its application in quantum mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of polynomial functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical concepts such as differences and sequences
  • Ability to manipulate equations and perform algebraic substitutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of Balmer's formula in spectroscopy
  • Learn about polynomial interpolation techniques for finding formulas from numerical sequences
  • Explore the relationship between wavelengths and frequencies in electromagnetic radiation
  • Study the concept of differences in sequences to identify patterns and predict future values
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or chemistry, mathematicians interested in polynomial functions, and anyone studying quantum mechanics or spectroscopy will benefit from this discussion.

elephantorz
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Balmer's Formula.

1. I am to find the formula of each series of wavelengths:
  • 12500, 31.25, 13.90, 7.81, and 5.00 nm
  • 375, 900, 1575, 2400, 3375, and 4500 nm
***Also, n might not always equal 1.

2. \lambda = \frac{94.18 nm} ({\frac{1}{m^{2}}) - (\frac{1}{n^{2}})})
Where m = 1, 2, 3, ... and n = m+1, m+2, ...​
3. My prof said that all I had to do was plug and chug, but I am not exactly sure what she meant by that, and do I assume that m is just zero at times?
I want to know if there is a way I can do this mathematically? She told me to THINK squares, so I attempted to take the square root of the numbers.

Any guidance will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wanted to clarify since I seem to have found the second one, it is talking about finding a FORMULA, so Balmer's formula is really useless in a way.

If a Mod would rename this I would really appreciate it, rename it to: Finding Formula given a series.
 
And I just figured out the second one, what a waste of forum-space!

Thanks anyway!

:D
 
One way is to take differences between succesive numbers, and see if a pattern emerges.
Take the differences of the differences is that doesn't work. If the differences are constant after n steps the numbers can be produced with a n'th degree polynomial.

since the numbers are wavelengths, you could try the frequencies as well.

I think the first number from a needs to be 125.00
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K