Wavelengths: Length between 2nd-order fringes

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the distance between the second-order fringes produced by two wavelengths of light passing through a double slit. The relevant parameters include the wavelengths of light, the distance between the slits, and the distance to the screen.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply formulas for both bright and dark fringes but expresses uncertainty about which to use. Some participants suggest starting with an algebraic formula for the distance between fringes before substituting numerical values.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the use of bright versus dark fringe formulas. There is an acknowledgment that the choice of formula may impact the results, especially given the different wavelengths involved. Some guidance has been offered about organizing the approach and ensuring the correct variables are included.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding whether to consider bright or dark fringes, as the problem does not specify. Participants are also discussing the importance of including the order of the fringes in their calculations.

okandrea
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Light of wavelenghs 4.80x10^2 nm and 632nm passes through two slits 0.52 mm apart. How far apart are the second-order fringes on a screen 1.6m away?

λ₁ = 4.80x10^2 nm = 4.80x10^-7m
λ₂ = 6.32x10^-7m
d = 0.52mm = 5.2x10^-4m
n = 2
L = 1.6

Homework Equations



(Maxima/Bright)
x/L = nλ/d
(Minima/Dark)
x/L = (n - 1/2)λ/d

*subscript of X would be n in both cases

△x = | x₁ - x₂ |

The Attempt at a Solution


I wasn't so sure which of the two formulas I would be using because there doesn't seem to be a clear indication as to whether or not it's bright/dark (this was what I mainly struggled with).

I tried using both but I don't understand if either of them are correct. I rearranged for x in both equations (moving the L variable to the right) and repeated it for each wavelength:

(A) Using dark:
x₁ = ((2 - 1/2)(4.80x10^-7)(1.6))/5.2x10^-4
x₁ = 2.2x10^-3m

x₂ = (2 - 1/2)(6.32x10^-7)(1.6))/5.2x10^-4
x₂ = 2.9x10^-3 m

△x = | 2.2x10^-3 - 2.9x10^-3 |
△x = 7.0x10^-4 m

(B) Using bright:
x₁ = ((2)(4.80x10^-7)(1.6))/5.2x10^-4
x₁ = 3.0x10^-3 m

x₂ = ((2)(1.6)(6.32x10^-7))/5.4x10^4
x₂ = 3.9x10^-3 m

△x = | 3.0x10^-3 - 3.9x10^-3 |
△x = 9.0x10^-4 m

They aren't too far off. I don't quite trust the textbook solutions since plenty of wavelength-related solutions were wrong. They did, however, use the formula for wavelengths with dark fringes...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If neither "bright" nor "dark" is explicitly mentioned, I would assume "bright", but that's my personal interpretation. Also, for better accuracy, I would first find an algebraic formula for Δx using just symbols and then put in the numbers.
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
I would first find an algebraic formula for Δx using just symbols and then put in the numbers.
Would that mean something like this?
Δx/L = λ/d
Δx = Lλ/d
 
okandrea said:
Would that mean something like this?
Δx/L = λ/d
Δx = Lλ/d
Not really, what happened to the ##n## in the expression? You need two expressions, one for each wavelength. It helps being organized.
1. For wavelength 1 you have ##x_1=nL\lambda_1/d##.
2. Write a similar expression for ##x_2##.
3. Find an algebraic expression for the difference ##x_2-x_1## for the second order fringes.
4. Put in the numbers.

On edit: My earlier statement that it doesn't matter if you use dark or bright fringes is incorrect. It does make a difference if the wavelengths are different. I edited that statement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K