MHB Solve Constant Alpha's in Images: Help to Understand and Get Unstuck

yakin
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
The book answer is 1, 3 and -2. I can't figure how they got it? Please help to understand and help me to get through where i got stuck.

Please look at images from bottom page to top page(where you see crossing on a page)
 

Attachments

  • partC.jpg
    partC.jpg
    21.1 KB · Views: 87
  • partB.jpg
    partB.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 85
  • partA.jpg
    partA.jpg
    24.7 KB · Views: 80
Physics news on Phys.org
You have correctly found that the characteristic root is $r=-1$ of multiplicity 3, however, you have not properly dealt with the fact that the root is repeated. Since this root is of multiplicity 3, the closed-form will be:

$$a_n=c_1(-1)^n+c_2n(-1)^n+c_3n^2(-1)^n=(-1)^n\left(c_1+c_2n+c_3n^2 \right)$$
 
Thank you for your feedback. I noticed that. I forgot to stick "n" in the general form of the solution with the repeated roots. Thanks though!

Question: How do you write maths directly with correct notation here? I have to take pics of my work and then upload the pics.
 
yakin said:
...
Question: How do you write maths directly with correct notation here? I have to take pics of my work and then upload the pics.

We have $\LaTeX$ implemented here to allow writing mathematical expressions.

Here is a link to a thread containing a pdf tutorial written by one of our staff:

http://mathhelpboards.com/latex-tips-tutorials-56/math-help-boards-latex-guide-pdf-1142.html
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top