Solve Cycling Force Problem: Mass, Resistance, Speed, Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter suppy123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the cycling force problem involving a cyclist of mass m experiencing wind resistance quantified by the equation -kv². Participants confirm that the cyclist's speed halves over a distance of 0.69m/k when she stops pedaling. Key equations utilized include ma = -kv² and the integration of dv/v² = -k/m ds, leading to the conclusion that ln(2)m/k = s, where s represents the distance traveled. The integration process and the relationship between distance and velocity are critical to deriving the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (ma = -kv²)
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Basic principles of motion and resistance in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration of differential equations in physics contexts
  • Learn about the application of logarithmic functions in motion equations
  • Explore the concept of drag force and its mathematical modeling
  • Investigate the relationship between mass, acceleration, and resistance in cycling dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, cycling enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the dynamics of motion and resistance in cycling scenarios will benefit from this discussion.

suppy123
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cyclist of mass m experiences a force due to wind resistance equal to -kv^2 when traveling at speed v on a horizontal road. Show that her speed halves in a distance of 0.69m/k if she stops pedalling.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


ma = -kv^2
i m not sure if i m right.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
suppy123 said:

ma = -kv^2
i m not sure if i m right.


well, you are right =)
So you are able to do it now?
 
lol :D but i don't get where to put 0.69m/k into the equation
and does it mean a = 0 when she stops pedalling?
 
suppy123 said:
lol :D but i don't get where to put 0.69m/k into the equation
and does it mean a = 0 when she stops pedalling?

Hi suppy123! :smile:

erm … you don't put 0.69m/k into the equation, you get it out of the equation! :rolleyes:

And no, a = 0 only when v = 0.

Hint: a = dv/dt. :smile:
 
hi, tim ;)
ma = -kv^2
m(dv/dt) = -kv^2
m(dv/dt) = -k(d/t)^2
m(dv/dt) = -k d^2/t^2
m(dv/dt) * 1/k^2 = -k * d^2/t^2 * 1/k^2
m(dv/dt) / k^2 = -d/k * d/t^2
i got it out ;)
 
oh suppy123 … a lot of that makes no sense at all! :redface:

(d/t) doesn't mean anything.

Nor does d^2/t^2 or d/k or d/t^2.
Hint: m(dv/dt) = -kv^2,

so mdv/v^2 = -kdt. :smile:
 
oh, does m in 0.69m/k means mass over k?
mdv/v^2 = -kdt
m/k = -dt/dv/v^2
m/k = -dt * v^2 /dv
 
integrate

Hi suppy123! :smile:
suppy123 said:
mdv/v^2 = -kdt
m/k = -dt/dv/v^2
m/k = -dt * v^2 /dv

hmm … very good … but you're just juggling with fractions.

you need to integrate.

Hint: ∫mdv/v^2 = -∫kdt :smile:
 
oo, but how do i find out the "t" from k
or it is just -m/v = 0 ??
 
  • #10
suppy123 said:
oo, but how do i find out the "t" from k
or it is just -m/v = 0 ??

You find the "t" by integrating, until you get an equation in t.

Fist step: What is ∫kdt?
 
  • #11
er,
k= -ma/v^2
k=-m(dv/dt)/v^2
∫kdt = -∫m(dv/dt)/v^2 dt = -∫m/v^2 dv = m/v
 
  • #12
suppy123 said:
∫kdt = -∫m(dv/dt)/v^2 dt = -∫m/v^2 dv = m/v

Yay! :biggrin:

Now integrate the left-hand side … what is ∫kdt? :smile:
 
  • #13
∫mdv/v^2 = -m/v = -∫kdt
∫kdt= m/v
 
  • #14
suppy123 said:
∫kdt= m/v

Yes, I know!

And I know you know!

And you know I know you know! :rolleyes:

But … now integrate the left-hand side! :smile:
 
  • #15
but i don't know the t
the left-hand side which is...?
 
  • #16
What who did next?

D'oh!

Hint:
K-k-k-katy beautiful Katy
You're the one and only girl that I adore
When the m-moonshine over the cowshed
I'll be waiting at the k-k-k=kitchen door

What is ∫kdt? :smile:
 
  • #17
0?
 
  • #18
… what kt did next …

tiny-tim said:
What is ∫kdt? :smile:

∫kdt = kt + constant.

So the original ∫kdt = -∫m dv/v^2 becomes:

kt = m/v + constant. :smile:
 
  • #19
Since you want the relation between distance and velocity, try this one.
ma = -kv^2
dv/dt = -k/m*v^2
dv/ds*ds/dt = -k/m*v^2
dv/ds*v =-k/m*v^2
dv/ds = -k/m*v
dv/v = -k/m*ds
Now integrate. Put the initial condition to find the constant of integration.
 
  • #20
- m/k = -vt+vc
m/k=vt-vc
 
  • #21
rl.bhat said:
Since you want the relation between distance and velocity, try this one.
ma = -kv^2
dv/dt = -k/m*v^2
dv/ds*ds/dt = -k/m*v^2
dv/ds*v =-k/m*v^2
dv/ds = -k/m*v
dv/v = -k/m*ds
Now integrate. Put the initial condition to find the constant of integration.

but it doesn't give any values except for the distance
 
  • #22
The integration becomes
ln(v) = -k/m*s + C
The initial condition is when s = 0 v = vo.
So ln(v) = -k/m*s + ln(vo)
Now find s when v = vo/2
 
  • #23
ln(vo/2) = -k/m*s + ln(vo)
ln(vo)-ln(2)=-k/m*s + ln(vo)
ln(2)m / k = s
0.69m/k = s :)
 
Last edited:
  • #24
suppy123 said:
ln(vo/2) = -k/m*s + ln(vo)
ln(vo)-ln(2)=-k/m*s + ln(vo)
ln(2)m / k = s

And there is your answer. I bet you can guess what ln(2) is :wink:.
 
  • #25
tim! i also want to know ur method :)
 
  • #26
Kurdt said:
And there is your answer. I bet you can guess what ln(2) is :wink:.

heh:redface:
 
  • #27
suppy123 said:
tim! i also want to know ur method :)

Hi suppy123! :smile:

kt = m/v + kC.

So v = m/k(t - C),

so dx/dt = m/k(t - C),

so dx = (m/k)dt/(t - C),

So x = … ? :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K