Solve Difficult Integral: Analytic Approximations Welcome

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rednas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on solving a complex integral involving the expression \(\int_0^{arccos(a)} d\phi \frac{cos(\phi)}{(cos(\phi)+\sqrt{cos^2(\phi) - a^2})(x \sqrt{cos^2(\phi)-a^2}+y sin(\phi) + z + x_0 cos(\phi) )}\) with the constraint \(0 PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of advanced calculus, particularly integrals and their properties.
  • Familiarity with Mathematica syntax for mathematical expressions.
  • Knowledge of Fourier Integral Theorem and its applications in wave equations.
  • Experience with parametric forms in spherical or cylindrical coordinates.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for simplifying complex integrals using Mathematica.
  • Study the Fourier Integral Theorem and its implications in signal processing.
  • Explore methods for converting integrals into spherical or cylindrical parametric forms.
  • Investigate analytic versus numerical methods for solving integrals in advanced calculus.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with complex integrals, particularly those interested in wave equations and Fourier analysis.

Rednas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I fear that this one is really hard, if not impossible, but an analytic answer would be way more usefull than a numerical one. Who can help me in the right direction?




\int_0^{arccos(a)} d\phi \frac{cos(\phi)}{(cos(\phi)+\sqrt{cos^2(\phi) - a^2})(x \sqrt{cos^2(\phi)-a^2}+y sin(\phi) + z + x_0 cos(\phi) )}

with 0<a<1 and the phi integral only over positive values of the squareroot

Approximations for y=0 and a small are also welcome.

This integral comes from the double integral \int_0^{\infty} dk\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi \frac{cos(\phi)}{(cos(\phi)+\sqrt{cos^2(\phi) - a^2}} e^{i k(x \sqrt{cos^2(\phi)-a^2}+y sin(\phi) + z + x_0 cos(\phi) )}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't understan anything of what you wrote.
could you post somthing more readible...

use the buttons if you don't understand tex code.

ciao
marco
 
Marco_84 said:
i don't understan anything of what you wrote.
could you post somthing more readible...

use the buttons if you don't understand tex code.

ciao
marco

Yeah i agree with u! i am staring at it for a few minutes but it is quite hard to dechiper, quite ambiguous!
 
sutupidmath said:
Yeah i agree with u! i am staring at it for a few minutes but it is quite hard to dechiper, quite ambiguous!
Ambiguous? I don't think that word means what you think it means. :-p The expression is written in the syntax of Mathematica. (and I'm pretty sure it's syntactically correct)
 
Hurkyl said:
Ambiguous? I don't think that word means what you think it means. :-p The expression is written in the syntax of Mathematica. (and I'm pretty sure it's syntactically correct)
Yeah i guess! I just wanted to say that it is hard to read what the OP posted, but i guess i said the wrong way!
 
Posted something more readable. Wasn't aware of the Tex possibilities at first, so I used the Mathematica syntax.
 
Rednas said:
I fear that this one is really hard, if not impossible, but an analytic answer would be way more usefull than a numerical one. Who can help me in the right direction?




\int_0^{arccos(a)} d\phi \frac{cos(\phi)}{(cos(\phi)+\sqrt{cos^2(\phi) - a^2})(x \sqrt{cos^2(\phi)-a^2}+y sin(\phi) + z + x_0 cos(\phi) )}

with 0<a<1 and the phi integral only over positive values of the squareroot

Approximations for y=0 and a small are also welcome.

This integral comes from the double integral \int_0^{\infty} dk\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi \frac{cos(\phi)}{(cos(\phi)+\sqrt{cos^2(\phi) - a^2}} e^{i k(x \sqrt{cos^2(\phi)-a^2}+y sin(\phi) + z + x_0 cos(\phi) )}

Let's hope someone will take the time to work this out, because it really looks nasty!
 
Probably, unfamiliarity with the advanced topic is creating the problem. But, as I know, this particular integral is of Fourier Integral Theorem, and it solved from the left to the right i.e. formal tactics of a regular double integration not necessarily followed. This means, this integral does not generates a surface of the solid, but rather simplifies the wave equation from amplitude to frequency domain. Or the same analogy holds also for any sinusoidal signal wave. The original question was not that complex, when all variables get converted into spherical or cylindrical parametric form, it looks quite messy, but in reality, it is only a tedious job, not genuine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K