MHB Solve Equation 5x - ||v|| v = ||w||(w-5x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote an unsolved question from MHF posted by user Civy71 on February 18th, 2013
Solve the equation 5x - ||v|| v = ||w||(w-5x) for x with v = (1, 2, -4, 0) and w = (-3, 5, 1, 1)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have:

$
\begin{aligned}5x-||v||v=||w||(w-5x)&\Leftrightarrow 5x+5||w||x=||w||w+||v||v\\&\Leftrightarrow 5(1+||w||)x=||w||w+||v||v\\&\Leftrightarrow x=\dfrac{1}{5(1+||w||)}(||w||w+||v||v)
\end{aligned}
$

Now, substitute $v=(1, 2, -4, 0)$, $w=(-3, 5, 1, 1 )$, $||w||=6$, $||v||=\sqrt{21}$.
 
Personally, I would have immediately substituted the given values for v and w.

5x - ||v|| v = ||w||(w-5x) for x with v = (1, 2, -4, 0) and w = (-3, 5, 1, 1)
so ||v||= \sqrt{1+ 4+ 16}= \sqrt{21} and ||w||= \sqrt{9+ 25+ 1+ 1}= \sqrt{38}

Let x= (w, x, y, z) so the equation becomes
(5w, 5x, 5y, 5z)- (\sqrt{21}, 2\sqrt{21}, -4\sqrt{21}, 0)= (-3\sqrt{38}, 5\sqrt{38}, \sqrt{38}, \sqrt{38})- (5\sqrt{38}w, 5\sqrt{38}x, 5\sqrt{38}y, 5\sqrt{38}z)
which gives the four numeric equations
5w- \sqrt{21}= -3\sqrt{38}- 5\sqrt{38}w
5x- 2\sqrt{21}= 5\sqrt{38}- 5\sqrt{38}x
5y+ 4\sqrt{21}= \sqrt{38}- 5\sqrt{38}y
5z= \sqrt{38}- 5\sqrt{38}z
 
HallsofIvy said:
Personally, I would have immediately substituted the given values for v and w.

All right, no problem with that. My preference was for the sake of generalization.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top