Solve Extension of Spring After Collision: 1kg & 50g Mass Merge

  • Thread starter Thread starter roovs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
roovs
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Spring with k=100N/m attached to the ceiling. Someone attaches mass of 1kg to the spring. After the spring reaches equilibrium another mass of 50g is dropped from a height of 2m above the 1st mass. After the collision of m1 and m2 the masses merge and continue to move.

a) Find extension of the spring 2s after the collision.
b) Find the maximal extension. Find amplitude and frequency.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok, we can find the initial extension (when it reaches equilibrium point):

mg=k*[tex]\Delta[/tex]l
[tex]\Delta[/tex]l = 0.098 m

and the speed of the new mass right after the collision:

m1v1+m2v2=(m1+m2)v
v = 0.298 m/s

Now I am lost. How is it possible to solve the first question without finding the amplitude first?

Since the new mass (after the collision) starts to move from equilibrium starting phase is T/4 and we can replace cos in x(t)=Acos(wt+[tex]\phi[/tex]) with sin. -> x(t)=Asin(wt)
Therefore extension of the spring after 2s should be: [tex]\Delta[/tex]l + x(t) => [tex]\Delta[/tex]l + Asin(wt)
Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So mechanical energy will stay the same after the collision? I thought it will change because it depends on angular frequency which in turn depends on mass.
 
roovs said:
So mechanical energy will stay the same after the collision?
Sure. After the collision, all forces are conservative: no mechanical energy is dissipated.

I thought it will change because it depends on angular frequency which in turn depends on mass.
The energy does not depend on angular frequency.
 
Oh, I had wrong understanding of involvement of energies in harmonic motion, apparently...
Thanks for you help Doc Al.