Solve for ##x## in the given logarithmic equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the logarithmic equation involving the expression ##\frac{1}{\log_x 2} + \frac{1}{\log_x 3} + \frac{1}{\log_x 6} = 3.6##. The correct solution is derived using the change of base formula, leading to the conclusion that ##x = 3.44##. Participants clarify the distinction between expressions like ##\log_2(2x)## and ##\log_2(x) \cdot 2##, emphasizing the importance of parentheses for clarity. The final solution is confirmed through both logarithmic identities and numerical evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and properties
  • Familiarity with the change of base formula for logarithms
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of natural logarithms (ln) and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the change of base formula for logarithms in depth
  • Explore logarithmic identities and their proofs
  • Practice solving logarithmic equations with varying bases
  • Learn about the applications of logarithms in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of logarithmic equations and their properties.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
421
Homework Statement
Find ##x## to three significant figures given;

$$\frac{1}{log_x 2}+ \frac{1}{log_x 3}+\frac{1}{log_x 6}= 3.6$$
Relevant Equations
Logarithms (change of base)
##\frac{1}{log_x 2}##+ ##\frac{1}{log_x 3}##+##\frac{1}{log_x 6}##=## 3.6##
##log_2x + log_3x+log_6x =3.6##
##log_2x ##+##\frac{log_2x}{log_2 3}##+##\frac{log_2x}{log_2 6}##=##3.6##
##log_2x ##[1+ ##\frac{1}{1.58496}##+##\frac{1}{2.58496}]##=##3.6##
hmmmm it took me some time here to note that,
(##log_2x ##)×(##2.01778##)=##3.6## (1)

i was stuck on thinking that ##log_2 2.01778x##= ##3.6 ##, ##→2^{3.6} = 2.01778x ## which is a wrong approach.

Therefore, from (1) above, we shall have;
##log_2x ##=##\frac{3.6}{2.01778}##
##log_2x ##=##1.78413##
##→2^{1.78413}## = ##x##
##x=3.44## bingo,

I am seeking any other alternative method...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see anything better. Your solution looks good.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Cheers Perok, great day...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
So in essence, ##log_2 x[2]##≠##log_2 2x##...
 
Last edited:
chwala said:
So in essence, ##log_2 x[2]##≠##log_2 2x##...
What does ##\log_2 x[2]## mean?
##\log_2(2x) = \log_2(2) + \log_2(x) = 1 + \log_2(x)##
 
Mark44 said:
What does ##\log_2 x[2]## mean?
##\log_2(2x) = \log_2(2) + \log_2(x) = 1 + \log_2(x)##
I meant ##\log_2 x⋅2## ...Kindly look at this in the context of the above problem ...
 
Last edited:
chwala said:
I meant ##\log_2 x•2## ...Kindly look at this in the context of the above problem ...
I've followed this thread all the way through, so I'm aware of the context. Your use of brackets in the expression ##\log_2 x[2]## threw me off. It would be much clearer with parentheses around the log argument; i.e., as ##\log_2 (x) \cdot 2##, which is better written as ##2\log_2(x)##.

The latter expression is equal to ##\log_2(x^2)##, which is different from ##\log_2(2x)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
Just a minute Mark, is that really correct? I do not think we can re- write, ##log_2 x⋅2## as ##2log_2 x##... Looking at laws of Logarithms, ##2 log_2 x ##=## log_2 x^{2}##...which isn't what we are dealing with in our problem. Kindly clarify on this with our problem in mind.

Ok I think I see your point, with parentheses in mind...cheers
 
Last edited:
Yes, my point is that parentheses around the argument make it easier to distinguish ##\log_2(x \cdot 2)## from ##\log_2(x) \cdot 2##.
 
  • #10
Changing the base of the logarithm from ##~x~## to that of natural logarithm,
##{~~~~}{ \small { \rm {log} }_x~N } = \frac { { \rm {log} }_e~N } { { \rm {log} }_e~x } = \frac { { \rm {ln} }~N } { { \rm {ln} }~x }~\Rightarrow~{ \small { \rm {ln} }~x~{\rm {log} }_x~N } = { \small { \rm {ln} }~N }##
so one gets
##{~~~}\frac 1{ {\rm {log}}_x~2} + \frac 1{ {\rm {log}}_x~3} + \frac 1{ {\rm {log}}_x~6} = { \small 3.6 }~\Rightarrow~\frac { { \rm {ln} }~x } { {\rm {ln}}~2 } + \frac { { \rm {ln} }~x } { {\rm {ln}}~3 } + \frac { { \rm {ln} }~x } { {\rm {ln}}~6 } = { \small 3.6 }##
##{~~~}\Rightarrow~\frac 1{ {\rm {ln}}~2 } + \frac 1{ {\rm {ln}}~3 } + \frac 1{ {\rm {ln}}~6 } = \frac { 3.6 } { { \rm {ln} }~x } = { \small 2.911045 } ##
##{~~~~}{ \small { \rm {ln} }~x } = \frac {3.6} {2.911045} = { \small 1.236669 } ##
##{~~~}\Rightarrow~{ \small x } = e^{1.236669} = { \small 3.444 }##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K