Solve Friction Problem: Max Force on 1.0 kg Block

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks, one on top of the other, with specific coefficients of friction and a query about the maximum horizontal force that can be applied to the lower block without causing the upper block to slip. The subject area includes concepts of friction, forces, and motion in a system of connected objects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions under which the upper block will slip, the relationship between the accelerations of both blocks, and the equations governing their motion. Questions arise regarding the correct interpretation of forces and the normal force acting on the blocks.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and attempting to clarify the relationships between the forces and accelerations. Some participants have provided equations and calculations, while others question the assumptions made regarding the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of missing information regarding the normal force and the calculations for frictional forces, which are being clarified through the discussion. Participants are also addressing the implications of accelerating reference frames in their reasoning.

Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
A 0.5 kg mass is on top of a 1.0 kg mass on a table. The static coefficient of friction between the blocks is 0.35, and the kinetic coefficient of friction between the table and1.0 kg block is 0.20. What's the maximum force that can be applied horizontally to the 1.0 kg block without letting the 0.5 kg block slip?

the acceleration of the small block has to be zero, so the friction between the two blocks cannot exceed 1.715 N.I got the equation for the first blockdown to F-3.675=1.0a but what do I do after that? Does the acceleration of the large block have to be zero as well, because if it does then the answer is 3.675 N.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
the acceleration of the small block has to be zero, . . . .
No it does not. Think about the motion that will occur if there is no slipping.
 
well won'tthe accelration of the small block havet to match that of the big one? Wouldn't that mean it is 0 in relation to the big block?
 
So is the answer 7.105 Newtons then?
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
well won'tthe accelration of the small block havet to match that of the big one? Wouldn't that mean it is 0 in relation to the big block?
Yes they have to be the same. Yes that means it is zero relative to the big block, but the big block is accelerating. You don't know how to do problems in accelerating reference frames. Do the problem in the laboratory frame. Both blocks will be accelerating.
 
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
So is the answer 7.105 Newtons then?
I don't think so. How did you get it?
 
well i found theat the equation for the large block was:
F-Ff-Ff=ma
F-1.96-1.715=1.0a
F-3.675=a

and for the small block:
Ff=ma
1.715=0.5a
a=3.43

then I substituted a into the first equation because they are accelerating at the same rate
F-3.675=3.43
F=7.105 N
 
Why 1.96? What is the normal force acting on the bottom of the 1kg block?
 
woops i forgot to add the 0.5 kg. So it would be 2.94 N instead?
 
  • #10
Fusilli_Jerry89 said:
woops i forgot to add the 0.5 kg. So it would be 2.94 N instead?
That looks better.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K