Solve GR Equations with Regular Method

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quZz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr Method Regular
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenges of formulating and solving problems in General Relativity (GR) without assuming symmetries such as spherical symmetry or homogeneity of time. Participants highlight the complexity of defining the stress-energy tensor T_{\mu\nu} for multiple point masses, particularly when considering arbitrary coordinate systems. The ADM formalism is suggested as a foundational tool for tackling initial value problems in numerical relativity. The interplay between problem statement and solution in GR is emphasized, raising questions about the uniqueness and solvability of such problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with the ADM formalism for numerical solutions
  • Knowledge of stress-energy tensors and delta functions
  • Basic concepts of coordinate transformations in GR
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the ADM formalism in detail for numerical relativity applications
  • Learn about the formulation of stress-energy tensors for multiple point masses
  • Explore coordinate transformation techniques in General Relativity
  • Investigate the uniqueness and solvability of GR equations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in the field of General Relativity, particularly those interested in numerical methods and the formulation of complex gravitational problems.

quZz
Messages
123
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,

I don't fully understand what is the regular method to state and solve problems in GR when no handy hints like spherical symmetry or homogeneity of time are assumed. If I find myself in arbitrary reference frame with coordinates [itex]x^0[/itex], [itex]x^1[/itex], [itex]x^2[/itex], [itex]x^3[/itex] the meaning of which is unknown beforehand (or known only locally), how do I proceed with boundary conditions and stress-energy tensor?

Consider the following simple problem: two point masses [itex]m_1[/itex], [itex]m_2[/itex] are separated by distance [itex]a[/itex]. Obviously [itex]T_{\mu\nu}[/itex] is a sum of two delta functions. Suppose the first mass is at the origin but where then is the second mass? Should I write [itex]\delta(x^1 - a)[/itex] or [itex]\delta(\sqrt{(x^1)^2 + x^1 x^2} - a)[/itex] or ...? You may say - OK, choose the coordinates in such a way that [itex]\delta(x^1 - a)[/itex] would be valid. But there are only 4 possible coordinate transformations, what if I had thousands of point masses?

So it seems that in general a statement of a problem in GR is interconnected with its very solution, which is confusing: are all problems solvable? uniquely? what would a "real mccoy" equation look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quZz said:
Hi everyone,

I don't fully understand what is the regular method to state and solve problems in GR when no handy hints like spherical symmetry or homogeneity of time are assumed. If I find myself in arbitrary reference frame with coordinates [itex]x^0[/itex], [itex]x^1[/itex], [itex]x^2[/itex], [itex]x^3[/itex] the meaning of which is unknown beforehand (or known only locally), how do I proceed with boundary conditions and stress-energy tensor?

Consider the following simple problem: two point masses [itex]m_1[/itex], [itex]m_2[/itex] are separated by distance [itex]a[/itex]. Obviously [itex]T_{\mu\nu}[/itex] is a sum of two delta functions. Suppose the first mass is at the origin but where then is the second mass? Should I write [itex]\delta(x^1 - a)[/itex] or [itex]\delta(\sqrt{(x^1)^2 + x^1 x^2} - a)[/itex] or ...? You may say - OK, choose the coordinates in such a way that [itex]\delta(x^1 - a)[/itex] would be valid. But there are only 4 possible coordinate transformations, what if I had thousands of point masses?

So it seems that in general a statement of a problem in GR is interconnected with its very solution, which is confusing: are all problems solvable? uniquely? what would a "real mccoy" equation look like?

As starting point:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADM_fo...Numerical_Solutions_of_the_Einstein_Equations

Read here about the ADM formalism in general, then its use for initial value problems in numerical relativity. Of course, start with wikipedia with a grain of salt, and study the references.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
962
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K