Solve Gyroscopic Precession Homework: Find Time for 1 Precession

  • Thread starter Thread starter csnsc14320
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precession
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a gyroscope consisting of a rotating disk and an axle, with the objective of finding the time required for one precession. The discussion centers around the dynamics of gyroscopic motion, including the effects of mass, radius, and angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the moment of inertia of both the disk and the axle, questioning how to incorporate these into the calculations for precession time. There are discussions about the torque generated and its relation to angular momentum.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on whether to include the moment of inertia of the rod and how it affects the torque and angular momentum calculations. Some participants suggest simplifying assumptions, while others advocate for a more comprehensive approach.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the inclusion of the rod's mass in the calculations, as well as the overall impact of various moments of inertia on the precession dynamics. Participants are navigating through these complexities without reaching a definitive consensus.

csnsc14320
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A gyroscope consists of a rotating disk with a 48.7cm radius suitably mounted at the midpoint of a 12.2cm long axle so that it can spin and precess freely. Its spin rate is 975 rev/min. The mass of the disk is 1.14kg and the mass of the axle is 130g. Find the time required for one precession if the axle is supported at one end and is horizontal.


Homework Equations


[tex]\omega_p = \frac{m g r}{L}[/tex]
[tex]\L = I \omega[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Using the equation, I plugged in (1.14kg+.130kg)(9.8m/s^2)(.112/2m)/(.5(1.14kg)(.487m)^2(32.5pi)) and got that [tex]\omega_p[/tex] = .05 rad/s, which will take 2.074 min to complete one full precession. However, the back of the book says the answer is 1.90 min. Am I forgetting something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must include the moment of inertia for the rod about the pivot point.
 
chrisk said:
You must include the moment of inertia for the rod about the pivot point.

I can't seem to figure out where to include it. Including it on the bottom (L = (Idisk + Irod)w) doesn't work, and trying to add the angular momentum of the precession doesn't seem to work either?
 
Think of the problem in two parts. Ignore the mass of the rod in the first part. This will give you the torque created in the azimuthal direction. This torque is applied to the rod. Find I for the rod and this will give you the net angular velocity or precession of the system.
 
I of rod = ML^2/3
Torque = (M of disk + M of rod)gR, since the rod's weight would also be contributing to the torque?)

If I use torque = (1.14 + .13)(9.8).112/2 = .697

then I have an equation torque = angular velocity of precession x angular momentum

if this is the right eq. to use, which angular momentum would I use?
 
I believe this problem takes into consideration the rod rotating. Then the moments of inertia of the rod and the wheel would add since they're rotating about the same axis and this would give the total moment of inertia

[tex]L=I_{wheel}\omega\mbox{ + }I_{rod}\omega[/tex]

So calculate the moment of inertia of the rod about an axis the same as the wheel.
 
I don't think it does take into account the rod's inertia - I just plugged into [tex]torque = \omega_p I_d \omega_d[/tex] and got the right answer. I don't think the rod's moment of inertia is counted since it would produce an angular momentum up, and therefore a torque up, but I think the precession is stable in a flat plane, so the bobbing motion is not taken into account.

Plus, if we were taking into account all the moment of inertias, wouldn't we add the moment of inertia of the disk about the axle, the moment of inertia of the rod about the pivot, AND the moment of inertia of the disk about the pivot?
 
Yes, the problem does not take into account the other moments of inertia because the rod is much lighter than the wheel so appoximations are made; the angular momentum vector due to the wheel is parallel with the axis of rotation. A rigorous analysis would show nutation, and fast and slow precession solutions. I'm glad you figured it out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
23K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K