Solve Integrals: Getting the Approximated Area

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving integrals to approximate the area under the curve of the function x² + 1 between the points 1 and 4. Initially, the user miscalculated the area using the fundamental theorem of calculus, resulting in an incorrect answer of 24 instead of the correct approximation of 17. After realizing the need for smaller subdivisions and accurately calculating the areas of rectangles under the curve, the user successfully determined the correct area by summing the areas of the rectangles. The final correct approximation was achieved by using the formula for the area of rectangles, confirming the importance of proper interpretation and method in solving integral problems. The user expressed relief and satisfaction upon resolving the confusion.
-_-'
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Studying integrals...

I am studying for my maths B exam that is coming up and may need some help in understanding some concepts.

Here is one question that i was getting some practise on but i got the wrong answer :eek:!

Q: The area under the curve x²+ 1 between 1 and 4 is approximated by left rectangles of width 1 unit. What is the total area of the aproximation?

A: Well I calculated the area using the fundamental theorem of calculus and I ended up with 24...but the answer was wrong it turned out to be 17 according to BOB. I then remember that the fundamental theorem of calculus give you the exact area not the aproximated area. I am not so sure about how to get the approximated area though. Is there a formula or something I can use?

I know that the x and y values I am interested in are as follows (0, 1), (1, 2), (2, 3) and (3, 4). I am trying to find the area under the curve at these points. I drew in the rectangles under the curve and found the area but I got a value of 10 . Nothing is working for me at the moment so I need help...I really did think that that would work but of course 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10 :redface:. But i haven't tried making the rectangles in smaller subdivisions yet so maybe that's what I have to do...and if anyone knows a formula or an easier way please tell me!

Well I'll try the smaller subdivision thing now and see if I get 17...and if I don't i'll be a little :mad:, but if someone has an easier way or some kind of formula i'll be :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I'm on the wrong track some how :confused:
 
Don't worry I figured it out...I was interpereting it wrongly, well actually the method I was using was wrong :blushing:. But its all good now :cool:. I worked it out my self :approve: yay! :smile: Now how did I get so confused on one of the easier questions...this always happens to me all the more difficult things i get but the easy things i don't, I am so weird sometimes. :biggrin:
 
How did I do it?

For those of you that are interested this is what i did:

Well I was thinking about the properties of a quadratic equation and then it came to me...I have to square the x values to get a y value (I don't know how I got this wrong :blushing: maybe I was a little overwhelmed by the scary word integral ) Any way I decided to draw the graph accurately and then draw rectangles under the curve, I had to work out the area of these rectangles to get the estimated area under the curve. Any way back to the equation, the equation was x² + 1, I knew that the y values are equal to x² + 1 (obviously :rolleyes:). The area under the curve I was interested in was below these points (1,3), (2, 5) and (3,4).

Here is an example of what I mean by rectangles under the curve: http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o272/science_f/000000000000000000rectanglesundercu.jpg Sorry about how crappy :redface: the drawing looks but you should get what I mean.

I calculated the area of the rectangles using L x W = A after I had worked out what all of the areas were I added them all to gether to get the estimated area. I ended up with 2 + 5 + 10 = 17. And there you have it the correct answer 17 :biggrin:.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K