Solve Inverse Laplace of 1 - Get Answer Instantly

  • Thread starter Thread starter aruna1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Laplace
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverse Laplace transform of the constant function 1. Participants are exploring the properties and definitions related to Laplace transforms and their inverses.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the inverse Laplace transform of 1 and questions whether it can be expressed as L-11=s. Other participants clarify the definitions and properties of Laplace transforms, noting the inverse Laplace transform of 1 is the Dirac delta function. Additionally, one participant raises a question about the validity of a property involving the inverse Laplace transform of s^k.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the topic, providing clarifications and exploring properties of Laplace transforms. Some guidance has been offered regarding the inverse Laplace transform of 1, but multiple interpretations and properties are still being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of confusion between the Laplace transform and its inverse, as well as the need for careful consideration of properties when discussing transforms involving the Dirac delta function.

aruna1
Messages
110
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



anyone know how to find inverse laplace of 1?
that is
L-11=?

The Attempt at a Solution



can we use
L-11=s ?
L{s}=s.(1/s)=1

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Normally, the Laplace tranform of a function of x is written as a function of s. You seem to be confusing the two. The Laplace transform of f(x)= x is
\int_0^\infty xe^{-sx}dx= \frac{1}{s^2}
by integration by parts, not 1. And you certainly cannot just multiply a Laplace transform you already know by the variable to get another Laplace transform!

The inverse Laplace transform of the constant 1 is the Dirac delta function \delta(x):
\int_0^\infty e^{-sx}\delta(x)dx= e^{-s(0)}= 1
since, by definition, \int_S f(x)\delta(x) dx= f(0) as long as the region of integration, S, includes 0.

Here's a good table of Laplace and inverse Laplace transforms:
http://www.vibrationdata.com/Laplace.htm
 
thank you:smile:
 
regarding this topic , using the Laplace transform properties would it be valid that

\mathcal L^{-1} (s^{k})= D^{k}\delta (t) ??

where k >0 any real number (at least this property seems to work with Fourier transforms)

the case k <0 would involve integration , but the integrals of the Dirac delta (with k integer) are well defined for t >0 (except perhaps at the point t=0 )
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
963
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K