Solve Inverse Matrices: 2x2, 3x3, and More - Easy Steps!

  • Thread starter Thread starter CRTNY
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Inverse
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the inverses of various matrices, specifically 2x2 and 3x3 matrices, using the Gauss-Jordan elimination method. Participants are exploring the steps involved in this process and expressing confusion about specific aspects of the method.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of equations derived from the matrices and express uncertainty about proceeding with the Gauss-Jordan method. Questions arise regarding the execution of row operations and the transformation of the matrix into reduced row echelon form.

Discussion Status

The conversation indicates that participants are actively engaging with the material, with some providing guidance on the steps of the Gauss-Jordan method. However, there is a lack of consensus on the execution of these steps, particularly in setting up the row equations and performing the necessary operations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention a deadline for the problems, which may add urgency to their inquiries. There is also a reference to an alternative method for finding inverses of 2x2 matrices, suggesting that different approaches are being considered.

CRTNY
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
#1)2 4
6 -4

#2) 1 4
-2 -8

#3) 3 1
0 2

#4) 1 5 6
2 1 1
0 -4 -8
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's confusing?
 
how to do the actual inverses...when it comes to the Gauss-Jordan method...i get lost
 
these problems are due by 2 tomm
 
Well, where do you get lost?
 
once you set up the equation (for example #1) to 2x+4z=1
6x+-4=0

and go on to set up 2 4| 1 0
6 -4| 0 1

...I don't know what to do from here...this step is where the Gauss-Jordan method comes in...and I don't know how to set up the Row equation...
 
Why are you talking about equations? When doing Gaussian elimination, you do nothing but row operations a matrices.
 
thats what i am referring to...
 
When doing GJ the method is to make the first row, first column a 1, and then 0's in the rest of the rows in that column. Since there is a 2 in R1 C1, you would take 1/2 R1 to make the two a one. Then you have to make the 6 a 0, so you would go: R2 - 6R1 (to get rid of the 6)

Now your matrix is:

1 2 | 1/2 0
0 -10 | -3 1

or something like that. Now make the -10 a 1 and make the two a 0 after that. Then the right hand side will be your inverse. There is an easier way of finding inverses for a 2x2 matrix using inverses though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K