Solve Laplace equation on rectangle domain

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving Laplace's equation in a rectangular domain with mixed boundary conditions. The original poster presents two boundary value problems defined on the square [0,a]x[0,b], both involving Laplace's equation and different types of boundary conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the method of separation of variables, with some expressing uncertainty about its implementation given the mixed boundary conditions. Questions arise regarding how to handle Dirichlet and Neumann boundaries simultaneously.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested breaking down the problem into simpler components or using a superposition of solutions to address the boundary conditions. There is ongoing exploration of how to apply the separation of variables method effectively in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the specific boundary conditions for each problem, including Dirichlet conditions at one edge and Neumann conditions at another, which complicates the application of standard methods. There is also mention of external references for further reading on the topic.

Dor
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm having issues with a Laplace problem. actually, I have two different boundary problems which I don't know how to solve analytically.
I couldn't find anything on this situations and if anybody could point me in the right direction it would be fantastic.
It's just Laplace's equation on the square [0,a]x[0,b] with a mixed boundary.

Homework Equations



  1. the first one is:

Uxx+Uyy=0
Ux(0,y)= 0
Ux(a,y)= f(y) (some function)
U(x,0)= 0
Uy(x,b)= v (some constant)

  1. the second is:

Uxx+Uyy=0
Ux(0,y)= 0
U(a,y)= g(y) (some function)
U(x,0)= 0
Uy(x,b)= v (some constant)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to do ordinary separable solution but I don't really know how to do this in such problems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know the variable separation method.
But I'm not sure how to do it when in one side of the rectangle there is a Dirichlet boundary U(x,b)=const and in the other one I have Neumann boundary Uy(x,0)=0
 
Laplace's equation is linear. You can always write the solution as a sum of solutions satisfying simpler boundary conditions. For example in the second problem you can set U = U_1 + U_2 where U_1 satisfies <br /> U_x(0,y) = 0 \\ U(a,y) = f(y) \\ U(x,0) = 0 \\ U_y(x,b) = 0 and U_2 satisfies <br /> U_x(0,y) = 0 \\ U(a,y) = 0 \\ U(x,0) = 0 \\ U_y(x,b) = v
 
I'm not sure how to solve it when I have one side with Dirichlet boundary and the other side with Neumann boundary.
U ( x , 0 ) = 0
U y ( x , b ) = 0
or
U ( x , 0 ) = 0
U y ( x , b ) = v
 
We're looking for U = \sum_n X_n(x)Y_n(y)

For U(x,0) = U_y(x,b) = 0 you need Y_n(0) = 0 and Y_n&#039;(b) = 0. Therefore set Y_n(y) = \sin k_ny so Y_n(0) = 0 is satisfied and k_n is determined by Y_n&#039;(b) = k_n\cos k_nb = 0.

For U(x,0) = 0 and U_y(x,b) = v, you should regard v as a function of x to be expanded as a Fourier series; accordingly Y_n will be an exponential function with Y_n(0) = 0 and (for convenience) Y_n&#039;(b) = 1. The combination of exponentials which satisfies these is Y_n(y) = \sinh(k_ny)/\sinh(k_nb) where k_n is determined by the boundary conditions on X_n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
19K