Solve Logarithmic Equation: Log _3(x-5) + Log _3(x+3)=2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Illuvitar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving logarithmic equations, specifically focusing on the equation log_3(x-5) + log_3(x+3) = 2 and another equation log(x+4) = log(x) + log(4). Participants express challenges in applying logarithmic properties and transitioning to quadratic forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to condense logarithmic expressions using properties of logarithms but expresses confusion about the transition to a quadratic equation. Some participants suggest using the quadratic formula or factoring, while others question the validity of negative roots in the context of logarithms. In the second problem, participants discuss the implications of moving logarithmic terms and the conditions for their definitions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problems, offering various approaches such as factoring, using the quadratic formula, and discussing the implications of logarithmic properties. There is a recognition of the need for clarity in the manipulation of logarithmic expressions, and some guidance has been provided regarding the conditions under which logarithms are defined.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the domain restrictions for logarithmic functions, specifically that x must be greater than certain values for the logarithmic expressions to be defined. There is also mention of potential confusion arising from the notation used in the equations.

Illuvitar
Messages
42
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


##log _3\left(x-5\right) + log_3\left(x+3\right) = 2##

I'm having trouble with applying properties of logarithms to solve equations, I think misunderstanding something fundamental here, I get most of the questions right but there are a handful that I have no idea what I am doing. Please help.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I try to condense the logs into one with the product rule so:
##log_3\left(x^2-2x-15\right) = 2##

then I rewrite it in exponential form:
##3^2=x^2-2x-15##

Now I figured that getting rid of the logs would make this quadratic equation manageable but I am coming up nowhere near the right answer (I peaked, its 6).

If I add 15 to both sides I get:
##24=x^2-2x##

but I don't know what to do with the quadratic...I feel like I messed up trying to get rid of the logs but I can't really identify where I screwed up. I tried to rework it a couple times with different tricks but I still am nowhere close. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quadratic formula?
 
Well I didn't use the quadratic formula but I did try factoring it after subtracting 24 from both sides but I got negative roots and I thought you couldn't have those in a logarithms domain? Sorry... I know this is easy math for a lot of you but I am teaching this to myself and am having a bit of trouble. Ill use the quadratic formula thanks.
 
Just to check, can you please show us the factorisation you did after subtracting 24? There should be one positive and one negative root.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Illuvitar said:
Well I didn't use the quadratic formula but I did try factoring it after subtracting 24 from both sides but I got negative roots and I thought you couldn't have those in a logarithms domain? Sorry... I know this is easy math for a lot of you but I am teaching this to myself and am having a bit of trouble. Ill use the quadratic formula thanks.

Why can't you use the quadratic formula?

An alternative is simply to "complete the square":

For example, take ##x^2 +2x - 3=0##. I want to write this as ##(x +1)^2 + F=0## for a certain ##F##. Clearly ##F=-4##. So the equation becomes ##(x+1)^2 -4 = 0##. Thus ##(x+1)^2 = 4##. Hence, ##x+1 = \pm 4##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Crap. I messed up on the factoring, I should have gotten (x-6)(x+4) but I wrote on my paper (x+6)(x+4). thanks.

And I guess I just didn't think to use the quadratic formula(or completing the square), usually when I use it I end up with complex roots and I think for logs I have to have real non-zero solutions. I'm not sure, I just started learning logs yesterday.
 
Oh and I have one more if you guys don't mind. This is one of the ones where I don't know where to start.

Homework Statement


##log(x+4)= logx+log4##

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I used the product rule to condense the right side
##log(x+4)=log(4x)##

but after that I have no idea what to do...
 
Illuvitar said:
Oh and I have one more if you guys don't mind. This is one of the ones where I don't know where to start.

Homework Statement


##log(x+4)= logx+log4##




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I used the product rule to condense the right side
##log(x+4)=log(4x)##

but after that I have no idea what to do...
If the logs of two numbers are equal, then the two numbers are equal.

Also, it's a good idea right at the start, to indicate what numbers are allowed for each of the log expressions. In this problem, you must have x > - 4 for log(x + 4) to be defined, and you must have x > 0 for log(x) to be defined. Together, these mean that x > 0.
 
Illuvitar said:
Oh and I have one more if you guys don't mind. This is one of the ones where I don't know where to start.

Homework Statement


##log(x+4)= logx+log4##

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I used the product rule to condense the right side
##log(x+4)=log(4x)##

but after that I have no idea what to do...

Move the logs to one side :smile: Also keep in mind that a^0=1 for any positive a.
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
If the logs of two numbers are equal, then the two numbers are equal.

Also, it's a good idea right at the start, to indicate what numbers are allowed for each of the log expressions. In this problem, you must have x > - 4 for log(x + 4) to be defined, and you must have x > 0 for log(x) to be defined. Together, these mean that x > 0.

Okay. So the equation becomes
##x+4=4x##
its not a quadratic so I can't factor it into two roots right? I am sorry I still don't know what to do from here...
 
  • #11
Mentallic said:
Move the logs to one side :smile: Also keep in mind that a^0=1 for any positive a.

If I move them to one side I get

##log(4x/x+4)=0## because of the quotient property right? but I don't know how to simplify it further.
And I am not sure I understand how I should use ##a^0=1##
its seems like the terms have an implied power of 1.
 
  • #12
Illuvitar said:
Okay. So the equation becomes
##x+4=4x##
its not a quadratic so I can't factor it into two roots right?
Right, it's not a quadratic. Add -x to both sides. This is really a simple equation...
Illuvitar said:
I am sorry I still don't know what to do from here...
 
  • #13
Illuvitar said:
If I move them to one side I get

##log(4x/x+4)=0## because of the quotient property right? but I don't know how to simplify it further.
And I am not sure I understand how I should use ##a^0=1##
its seems like the terms have an implied power of 1.

##e^0 = ...##
 
  • #14
Mark44 said:
This is really a simple equation...

Alright sorry...
 
  • #15
Illuvitar said:
If I move them to one side I get

##log(4x/x+4)=0## because of the quotient property right? but I don't know how to simplify it further.
You have really made it complicated. Also, I think the fraction is intended to be ##\frac{4x}{x + 4}##, so you should have written it as 4x/(x + 4) if that's what you meant. Without the parentheses, knowledgeable people would interpret it as (4x/x) + 4.
Illuvitar said:
And I am not sure I understand how I should use ##a^0=1##
its seems like the terms have an implied power of 1.
Of course. x is the same as x1.
 
  • #16
Illuvitar said:
If I move them to one side I get

##log(4x/x+4)=0## because of the quotient property right? but I don't know how to simplify it further.
And I am not sure I understand how I should use ##a^0=1##
its seems like the terms have an implied power of 1.

I woke up too early this morning to start answering questions. Clearly if

\log(a)=\log(b) then a=b. Moving everything to one side, using a log property and then using the definition of logs as so:

\log(a)=\log(b)

\log(a)-\log(b)=0

\log\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)=0

\frac{a}{b}=1

a=b

Is just a long winded way of showing the same thing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K