Solve for x: 2^3+2^3+2^3+2^3=2^x

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving the equation 2^3 + 2^3 + 2^3 + 2^3 = 2^x, which falls under the subject area of exponentiation and logarithmic properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of logarithms to simplify the equation, with one participant attempting to apply logarithmic properties but questioning the validity of their approach. Others suggest that logarithms may not be necessary and propose focusing on the properties of exponents instead.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest alternative methods to approach the problem, emphasizing the properties of exponents over logarithmic manipulation. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion in the application of logarithmic properties and emphasize the importance of correctly interpreting the equation without unnecessary complexity.

LogarithmLuke
Messages
82
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Solve the following equation: 2^3+2^3+2^3+2^3=2^x[/B]

Homework Equations


log(a)^x=x*log(a)[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


What i attempted was to log both sides, bring down the exponents, and summarize them. This left me with 12*log(2)=x*log(2). I then divide both sides by log(2) and get x=12, which is wrong. Please note that all of this was with logarithms with base number 10.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Where did you get your relevant equation ? It's dead (*) wrong, but visually close to the right one: ##\log (a^x) = x \log a##.

Taking logarithms of a sum is generally a bad idea. For a product you are better off. So make a product of the lefthand side.
And look at that. Maybe you don't need to take logarithms, but you might be able to use a simpler equation about exponentiation.

PS the term "summarizing" isn't all that mathematically sound... "sum" is what you mean. But you can't do that.

(*) [edit] well, dangerous is a better expression. It raises confusion between ##(\log a)^x## and ##(\log (a^x))##
 
I can see no reason to use logarithms. You are just trying to find x such that 2^x= 32. That should be elementary.
 
I second what BvU says. If this is an exercise of the properties of exponents, you should notice that 2^3 is a repeated sum...how many times is it repeated?
Rewrite it as a coefficient times 2^3, then write your coefficient as a power of 2.
Now, you will be able to use properties of exponents to quickly solve for x.

Otherwise, just add 8+8+8+8 and do what HallsofIvy suggested.

And if you are really feeling like using logarithms ... use log base 2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K