Solve Optics Problem w/ Hi/Ho Formula & Understand Measurements

  • Thread starter Thread starter unctarheels1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Optics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves understanding the height of an object (a tree) as it relates to a plane mirror and the measurements provided in the context of optics. The scenario describes a mirror that reflects the image of the tree, with specific distances from the observer and the mirror.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the hi/ho formula and question the meaning of the measurements given in the problem. There is confusion regarding the relationship between the height of the image and the distances involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants clarifying the roles of the man and the tree in the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of similar triangles to approach the problem, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the measurements or the application of formulas.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of information regarding the height of the tree and the relevance of the distances provided (5 cm and 30 cm) in relation to the problem. Participants are questioning the assumptions made about the objects involved.

unctarheels1
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In the following problem, I am having trouble understanding the components.

- The image of a man just covers the length of a 5cm plane mirror when the mirror is held vertically 30cm from the eye. The tree is 100m from the mirror. What is the height?

* To find the height you would use hi/ho = -i/o
and you would also use 1/i + 1/o = 1/f to find these components. But I can not understand what the measurements mean in the question.

The object would be the tree, 100m from the mirror.
What are the other two (5cm and 30 cm)

Can I use the hi/ho formula directly for this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there more information, such as the height of the man, or does the tree image span the same mirror held at 30 cm from the eye? If 'man' was 'tree' the problem would make more sense.

Maybe I am missing something.
 
The man is the tree, I was thinking about something else when I typed it in.
 
Since it is a plane mirror, one wound not use 1/i + 1/o = 1/f, or rather 1/f = 0.

Think about looking through a plane of glass at the same tree. The image at 30 cm is 5 cm high, whereas the actual object is 100 m from the observer.

Draw a triangle with a leg 5 cm high at 30 cm (0.3 m) along the base from the vertex (observer). Then extend to a similar triangle along the base 100 m.

Now with respect to the mirror, if the tree is 100 m, behind the observer (vertical plane through eye), then the image of the tree would 0.3 m (from observer to mirror, and 100.3 m from mirror to tree).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
941
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
27K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K