Solve Optics Problem w/ Hi/Ho Formula & Understand Measurements

  • Thread starter Thread starter unctarheels1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Optics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an optics problem involving a plane mirror, where a 5 cm image of a tree is viewed from 30 cm away. The key formula mentioned is hi/ho = -i/o, but there is confusion regarding the measurements and how they relate to the problem. The object is identified as the tree, which is 100 m from the mirror, while the 5 cm height and 30 cm distance pertain to the image's dimensions and observer's position, respectively. Clarification is provided that since it is a plane mirror, the focal length is effectively zero, and the problem can be visualized using similar triangles to relate the image height to the actual tree height. Ultimately, understanding the geometry and relationships between the distances is crucial for solving the problem.
unctarheels1
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In the following problem, I am having trouble understanding the components.

- The image of a man just covers the length of a 5cm plane mirror when the mirror is held vertically 30cm from the eye. The tree is 100m from the mirror. What is the height?

* To find the height you would use hi/ho = -i/o
and you would also use 1/i + 1/o = 1/f to find these components. But I can not understand what the measurements mean in the question.

The object would be the tree, 100m from the mirror.
What are the other two (5cm and 30 cm)

Can I use the hi/ho formula directly for this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there more information, such as the height of the man, or does the tree image span the same mirror held at 30 cm from the eye? If 'man' was 'tree' the problem would make more sense.

Maybe I am missing something.
 
The man is the tree, I was thinking about something else when I typed it in.
 
Since it is a plane mirror, one wound not use 1/i + 1/o = 1/f, or rather 1/f = 0.

Think about looking through a plane of glass at the same tree. The image at 30 cm is 5 cm high, whereas the actual object is 100 m from the observer.

Draw a triangle with a leg 5 cm high at 30 cm (0.3 m) along the base from the vertex (observer). Then extend to a similar triangle along the base 100 m.

Now with respect to the mirror, if the tree is 100 m, behind the observer (vertical plane through eye), then the image of the tree would 0.3 m (from observer to mirror, and 100.3 m from mirror to tree).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top