Solve Orbital Mechanics Homework: Find Circular Orbit, Stability, Period

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing a particle's motion in a force field characterized by a specific force equation. The tasks include determining the conditions for a circular orbit, assessing the stability of that orbit under perturbations, and calculating the period of small oscillations around the stable orbit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the condition for a circular orbit and how to express perturbations in the equation of motion. There are attempts to linearize the equations and explore the implications of approximating the exponential function. Some participants question the presence of certain terms in their derived equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various participants providing insights and suggestions for simplifying the problem. Some have proposed methods for linearization and checking assumptions, while others are verifying their results against each other. There is no explicit consensus on the derived conditions yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the depth of exploration and the use of external resources. The discussion reflects a focus on algebraic manipulation and approximation techniques relevant to the problem.

kreil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
665
Reaction score
68

Homework Statement


I know how to do this problem, I'm just having trouble actually doing it.

A particle moves in a force field described by,

[tex]F(r)=-k(ar+1)\frac{e^{-ar}}{r^2}[/tex]

1. Obtain the condition for a circular orbit of radius r0
2. Apply a perturbation to the circular orbit and find the condition between a and r0 for the orbit to be stable
3. Obtain the period of the small oscillation about the stable circular orbit

Homework Equations


From previous parts of the problem, I obtained the equation of motion to be,

[tex]m \ddot r - \frac{l^2}{mr^3} + k(ar+1)\frac{e^{-ar}}{r^2}=0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



1. The condition for a circular orbit is

[tex]f_{eff}(r_0)=0 \implies k(ar_0+1)\frac{e^{-ar_0}}{r_0^2} = \frac{l^2}{mr_0^3}[/tex]

2. The way to do part 2 is to define [itex]r=r_0+ \rho[/itex], [itex]\ddot r = \ddot \rho[/itex], plug these into the equation of motion, then get the equation into the form

[tex]\ddot \rho + \omega^2 \rho = 0[/tex]

Then the condition for the circular orbit to be stable is [itex]\omega^2>0[/itex].

In this case, however, I'm having trouble getting the equation of motion into that form:

[tex]m \ddot \rho - \frac{l^2}{m(r_0+\rho)^3}+k(a(r_0+\rho)+1)\frac{e^{-a(r_0+\rho)}}{(r_0+\rho)^2}=0[/tex]Using [itex]\frac{1}{(r_0+\rho)^n} = \frac{1}{r_0^n} \left ( 1-\frac{n \rho}{r_0} \right )[/itex] and the condition for a circular orbit in 1,

[tex]m \ddot \rho - \frac{l^2}{mr_0^3} + \frac{3l^2 \rho}{mr_0^4} +k(ar_0+a\rho+1)\frac{e^{-a(r_0+\rho)}}{(r_0+\rho)^2}=0[/tex]

...

[tex]m \ddot \rho + \frac{3l^2 \rho}{mr_0^4} + \frac{l^2}{mr_0^3} \left [ e^{-a \rho} \left ( 1 - \frac{2 \rho}{r_0} \right ) \left ( 1 + \frac{a \rho}{(ar_0+1)} \right ) -1 \right ] =0[/tex]And if I multiply everything out and get rid of the brackets there are exponentials with rho, as well as terms with rho^2.

Any help or suggestions is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the algebra will be a bit easier if you define [tex]\rho[/tex] to be dimensionless via [tex]r = r_0 (1+\rho),[/tex] but that's certainly not necessary. You want to linearize the equation of motion for [tex]\rho[/tex], therefore you should continue expanding the exponential and drop the quadratic and higher terms everywhere. Requiring stable solutions will lead to an inequality for [tex]ar_0[/tex].
 
So I can just approximate the exponential to first order using taylor series?
 
When you find the condition on [tex]ar_0[/tex] you can check if [tex]a\rho \ll 1[/tex] was a good approximation (having assumed that [tex]\rho \ll r_0[/tex] already).
 
The condition I ended up with is

[tex]2ar_0+1>0[/tex]

which just seems trivial. Is this what you got?
 
I think you might have missed an [tex](ar_0)^2[/tex] term. I found

[tex]1 +(ar_0) > (ar_0)^2[/tex]

which can be simplified further by finding the roots.
 
I don't see where that squared term comes from. Here is what I did:

[tex] m \ddot \rho + \frac{3l^2 \rho}{mr_0^4} + \frac{l^2}{mr_0^3} \left [ e^{-a \rho} \left ( 1 - \frac{2 \rho}{r_0} \right ) \left ( 1 + \frac{a \rho}{(ar_0+1)} \right ) -1 \right ] =0 [/tex]

Assume ap << 1 so that the exponential is 1. Then

[tex] m \ddot \rho + \frac{3l^2 \rho}{mr_0^4} + \frac{l^2}{mr_0^3} \left [ 1 + \frac{a \rho}{(ar_0+1)} - \frac{2 \rho}{r_0} - \frac{2a \rho^2}{r_0(ar_0+1)} -1 \right ] =0 [/tex]

The 1's cancel and the p^2 term is very small, so

[tex]m \ddot \rho + \frac{3l^2 \rho}{mr_0^4} + \frac{l^2}{mr_0^3} \left [\frac{a \rho}{(ar_0+1)} - \frac{2 \rho}{r_0} \right ] = m \ddot \rho + \frac{3l^2 \rho}{mr_0^4} + \frac{l^2 a \rho}{ m r_0^3 (ar_0+1)} - \frac{2l^2 \rho}{mr_0^4} = 0[/tex]

Collecting in powers of p,

[tex]m \ddot \rho + \left ( \frac{l^2 }{mr_0^4} + \frac{l^2 a }{mr_0^3(ar_0+1)} \right )\rho =0[/tex]

[tex]\implies \ddot \rho + \omega^2 \rho = 0[/tex]

[tex]\omega^2 = \frac{1}{m} \left ( \frac{l^2 }{mr_0^4} + \frac{l^2 a }{mr_0^3(ar_0+1)} \right ) > 0[/tex]
 
kreil said:
Assume ap << 1 so that the exponential is 1.

You need to expand the exponential to linear order,

[tex]e^{-a\rho} \sim 1 - a\rho.[/tex]
 
Thanks for the help fzero
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K