MHB Solve Real Number $x$ That Satisfies Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Find a real number $x$ that satisfy the following equation:

$x = \sqrt{(x-667)(x-736)}+\sqrt{(x-736)(x-928)}+\sqrt{(x-928)(x-667)}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Optimistic guess: suppose that $x-667$, $x-736$ and $x-928$ are all perfect squares, say $x-667 = a^2$, $x-736 = b^2$ and $x-928 = c^2$. Then $a^2 - b^2 = 736 - 667 = 69$. But if $a$ and $b$ are integers with $(a+b)(a-b) = 69$ then either $a+b=23$ and $a-b = 3$ or $a+b=69$ and $a-b = 1$. In the first of those cases, $a=13$ and $b=10$. Then $x-667 = 13^2 = 169$, so that $x= 836$. But if $x = 836$ then $c^2 = 836 - 928$, which is negative. So that solution does not work.

I then tried the other possible case, with $a+b=69$ and $a-b = 1$, but that did not lead to a solution either. So it looked as though there was not going to be a solution in integers.

But then the fact that $c^2$ turned out to be negative in my first attempt at a solution made me think about the possibility that $x-667$, $x-736$ and $x-928$ might all be negatives of squares. In that case, my first solution would have to be adjusted, to make $x-667 = -100$ so that $x=567$. Then $x-736 = -169 = -13^2$ and $x-928 = -361 = -19^2$.

Finally, if $x = 567$ then $$\begin{aligned}\sqrt{(x-667)(x-736)}+\sqrt{(x-736)(x-928)}+\sqrt{(x-928)(x-667)} &= \sqrt{(-100)(-169)} + \sqrt{(-169)(-361)} + \sqrt{(-361)(-100)} \\ &= 10*13 + 13*19 + 19*10 \\ &= 130+247+190 \\ &= 567.\end{aligned}$$
 
If I see correctly, there should be 2 distinct solutions over real numbers for the equation, one of which around \( x \approx 1184.13 \). Does the finding of this include to the challenge too?
 
Hi Theia, as long as you find one real $x$ value that satisfies the given equation, then that $x$ will be an answer to the problem.
 
We can write the original equation in the form
\[x = \sqrt{a} + \sqrt{b} + \sqrt{c},\]
where
\[\begin{align*}
a &= (x - 667)(x - 736) \\
b &= (x - 736)(x - 928) \\
c &= (x - 928)(x - 667).
\end{align*} \]
By solving the $\sqrt{c}$ from the equation and squaring one obtains
\[c = x^2 - 2x\sqrt{b} - 2x\sqrt{a} + b + 2\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b} + a. \]
Let's now move all terms with $\sqrt{b}$ dependence to left hand side and others to right hand side:
\[2\sqrt{b} \left( \sqrt{a} - x \right) = -x^2 + 2x\sqrt{a} + c - b - a.\]
After squaring only $\sqrt{a}$ is left. Collecting those terms and squaring one can write \[\begin{align*}
& x^4 - 4x^3\sqrt{a} - 2cx^2 - 2bx^2 + 6ax^2 + 4cx\sqrt{a} + 4bx\sqrt{a} - 4ax\sqrt{a} \\
& \quad + c^2 - 2bc - 2ac + b^2 - 2ab + a^2 = 0 \qquad \Leftrightarrow \end{align*} \]
\[\begin{align*}
4x\sqrt{a} \left( x^2 - c - b + a \right) = &\ x^4 - 2cx^2 - 2bx^2 + 6ax^2 + c^2 - 2bc \\
& - 2ac + b^2 - 2ab + a^2,
\end{align*}\]
and finally
\[\begin{multline}
x^8 - 4\left( a + b + c \right) x^6 + \left( 6c^2 + \left( 4b + 4a \right) c + 6b^2 + 4ab + 6a^2 \right ) x^4 \\
+ 4\left( \left( a + b - c \right) c^2 + \left( b^2 - 10ab + a^2 \right) c - b^3 + ab^2 + a^2b - a^3\right) x^2 \\
+ c^4 - 4\left( a + b \right) c^3 + \left( 6b^2 + 4ab + 6a^2 \right) c^2 + \left( -4b^3 + 4ab^2 + 4a^2b \right. \\
\left. - 4a^3 \right) c + b^4 - 4ab^3 + 6a^2b^2 - 4a^3b + a^4 = 0.
\end{multline}\]
Let's now substitute expressions for $a$, $b$ and $c$ and simplify:
\[\begin{align*}
& 29156245504x^5 - 84494799470592x^4 + 90809255028129792x^3 \\
& - 46242678657209335808x^2 + 11296854647375577219072x \\
& - 1067552764176992047202304 = 0. \end{align*} \]
This quintic can be reduced because we know its one solution, namely $x = 567$ by Opalg. Hence we obtain a quartic:
\[ x^4-2331x^3+1792896x^2-569457920x+64576528128 = 0. \]
The solution of this quartic is a boring algebraic procedure. First one needs to substitute $x = t + 2331/4$ to get rid of the $x^3$ term. Hence the quartic equation can be written as
\[ t^4 - \frac{1957515}{8}t^2 - \frac{504331747}{8}t - \frac{1124218036179}{256} = 0. \]
Next one needs to move $t^1$ and $t^0$ terms to right hand side, and manipulate the left hand side to a square:
\[ \left( t^2 - \frac{1957515}{16} \right) ^2 = \frac{504331747}{8}t + \frac{1239020752851}{64}. \]
To get the right hand side to a square too, one can add an unknown number $q$ to the equation such that left hand side stays a square. In other words: \[ \left( t^2 - \frac{1957515}{16} + q \right)^2 = 2qt^2 + \frac{504331747}{8}t + q^2 - \frac{1957515q}{8} + \frac{1239020752851}{64}. \]
Left hand side is a quadratic function of $t$ now. For this to be a perfect square, one must write its discriminant (with respect to $t$) equal to $0$.
\[ 512q^3 - 125280960q^2 + 9912166022808q - 254350511032072009 = 0. \]
To solve this cubic one first substitutes $q = p + 652505/8$ to remove $q^2$ term. That gives the reduced cubic
\[ p^3 - 597930816p - 2945222125792 = 0. \]
Now, as the cubic has 3 real roots (check out yourself!), one can manipulate the reduced cubic using the formula for cosine, $4\cos ^3 \theta - 3\cos \theta = \cos 3\theta$. To do this, one substitutes $p = u\cos \theta$ and chooses $u$ accordingly:
\[\begin{align}
4\cos ^3 \theta - \frac{2391723264}{u^2}\cos \theta &= \frac{11780888503168}{u^3} \quad \Rightarrow \\
\frac{2391723264}{u^2} &= 3 \quad \Leftrightarrow \\
u &= 10672\sqrt{7} \quad \Rightarrow \\
\cos 3\theta &= \frac{206879}{149408\sqrt{7}} \end{align}\]
Now one can solve $\theta$ and hence finally $q$ by going backwards the substitutions that were made:
\[\begin{align*}
\theta &= \frac{1}{3}\arccos \left( \frac{206879}{149408\sqrt{7}} \right) + \frac{2n\pi}{3} \quad \Rightarrow \\
p &= 10672\sqrt{7} \cos \left( \frac{1}{3}\arccos \left( \frac{206879}{149408\sqrt{7}} \right) + \frac{2n\pi}{3} \right) \quad \Rightarrow \\
q &= \frac{652505}{8} + 10672\sqrt{7} \cos \left( \frac{1}{3}\arccos \left( \frac{206879}{149408\sqrt{7}} \right) + \frac{2n\pi}{3} \right) .
\end{align*} \]
Hence the approximate solutions for the parameter $q$ are:
\[\begin{align*}
q_{n=0} &= q_0 \approx 108182.1818025683 \\
q_{n=1} &= q_1 \approx 60098.83251836192 \\
q_{n=2} &= q_2 \approx 76408.36067906974.
\end{align*}\]
Now, as the number $q$ is known, one can continue the solving of the quartic equation and write its left hand side to a square:
\[ \left( t^2 + q - \frac{1957515}{16} \right) ^2 = 2q\left( t + \frac{504331747}{32q} \right) ^2. \]
After moving terms to right hand side, one can use the formula $a^2 - b^2 = (a+b)(a-b)$:
\[\begin{multline}
\left[ \frac{32q^2 - 3915030q + 504331747\sqrt{2q}}{32q} + \sqrt{2q} \ t + t^2 \right] \\
\cdot \left[ \frac{32q^2 - 3915030q - 504331747\sqrt{2q}}{32q} - \sqrt{2q} \ t + t^2 \right] = 0.
\end{multline} \]
Now these 2 quadratic equations are trivial to solve and one can write down the solutions for the original quartic (and hence the original square root equation) by going backwards the substitutions: \[\begin{align}
x_1 &= \frac{2331}{4} - \frac{ 4\sqrt{2q^3} + \sqrt{2}\sqrt{ -16q^3 + 3915030q^2 - 504331747\sqrt{2q^3}}}{8q} \\
x_2 &= \frac{2331}{4} - \frac{ 4\sqrt{2q^3} - \sqrt{2}\sqrt{ -16q^3 + 3915030q^2 - 504331747\sqrt{2q^3}}}{8q} \\
x_3 &= \frac{2331}{4} + \frac{ 4\sqrt{2q^3} - \sqrt{2}\sqrt{-16q^3 + 3915030q^2 + 504331747\sqrt{2q^3}}}{8q} \\
x_4 &= \frac{2331}{4} + \frac{ 4\sqrt{2q^3} + \sqrt{2}\sqrt{-16q^3 + 3915030q^2 + 504331747\sqrt{2q^3}}}{8q} ,
\end{align}\]
where $q = q_1$ (or $q_0$ or $q_2$, but preferred the smallest absolute value). A closer look to the solutions $x_i$ tells, only $x_4 \approx 1184.131\ldots$ is correct and rest are false solutions due to the squaring of the original equation.

P.S. Posted this from phone... Line breaks can be placed poorly. Sorry about that! (Whew)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
960
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top